From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/33] nds32: Cache and TLB routines
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 16:30:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CAEbi=3eKH5JESwtadq4LKF3ZvmBi1QwUWpCTb0btierBST_cRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <cover.1512723245.git.green.hu@gmail.com> <9d0e976c3e60bf6834dffb6ef798ad2a03e1c9ac.1512723245.git.green.hu@gmail.com>
 <20171213021619.GA6254@gary-OptiPlex-3050> <CAEbi=3dtcnUNbd4SoueUnoYvRWot9fA1n62t0b4PWx1UYs2jZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171213081949.GA18840@gary-OptiPlex-3050>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20171213081949.GA18840@gary-OptiPlex-3050>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>
Cc: Greentime <greentime@andestech.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com>, DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

2017-12-13 16:19 GMT+08:00 Guo Ren <ren_guo@c-sky.com>:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:45:02PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
>
>> I think it should be fine if an interruption between mtsr_dsb and
>> tlbop_rwr because this is a optimization by sw.
>
> Fine? When there is an unexpected vaddr in SR_TLB_VPN, tlbop_rwr(*pte) will
> break that vaddr's pfn in the CPU tlb-buffer entry. When linux access the
> vaddr, it will get wrong data unless the entry has been replaced out.

Hi, Guo Ren:

Thanks. I get your point.
It is needed to be protected.
I will fix it in the next version patch.

if (vma->vm_mm == current->active_mm) {
        local_irq_save(flags);
        __nds32__mtsr_dsb(addr, NDS32_SR_TLB_VPN);
        __nds32__tlbop_rwr(*pte);
        __nds32__isb();
        local_irq_restore(flags);
}