From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com (mail-ed1-f46.google.com [209.85.208.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E2F3D561 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 09:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.46 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762939826; cv=none; b=XNDIUlRnXxuE15jjB+LjrnylOYr+l1sS9apbvXEDnnUTfCZJ2nzlOonNjtSt1nM6ptMBJTDxlrKLJbQsUNpLFpgfTaG7BnYv5cGezhh7Svcy0lQKRh+mYh87lQ6XW6E5VqcM/4JjSLgd8gedLOJvQ1DsClWqKzHNszzSBc4Jzn8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762939826; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Vfncq6F+5VOllwyvE5UQeZbhoDYhwTMEClEBA9ZFmkk=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=nVi1ak6HyF/T3pI+ZmuVhjnrgfMxyuZa10TKlo8GGsi54lJvDtbnGbTgo/sDZpyjv/lTGqxFL6xzniPkVRqT/8o6eflc+JssAXn5+ZlAQ92E3zdIMUB6Q0eEGxP1LltMN5EcVckWL6lCBHy5xZdl5HESHkJXWCCyUIlvzyQdq3A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Imk1G+ha; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.46 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Imk1G+ha" Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-6431b0a1948so1032830a12.3 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:30:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1762939823; x=1763544623; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=lqCuPp9H8HI1+6gmMgoIdl2q4ASSXdaZj3EL+jeW6CU=; b=Imk1G+ha1V+N22lgUNL7mwfw6W8mfRBtlqowVk6j6mcvjabfhlWPJAwfEljIl92+YH THH1lCOJVdPudSkULNvhnfSaGT4cjr4MCGn54bdEa5rY0B5DcBPzN1iwK7fFBssdQOXS y30j2J2BZO+o5a8FPsmnYtBsqIZsAfwYR4evJiiS2a2xOlBJ6MPhmWcdPaQdFhGc934f rz8TnFAF4/lfYlCwnf+NTtr8ACqPfFmyedBXBdCSb2+INbQB3BI/feHY04g96tH+PIeg hSzaYD6jwYz7OgdHXQyf3oDT4AfJpMif/WmYohdO+8nI/ei8oJfdfcJIXt112sls4rrX EabA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762939823; x=1763544623; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lqCuPp9H8HI1+6gmMgoIdl2q4ASSXdaZj3EL+jeW6CU=; b=E9epYxoXH/Fyws7HCnlnSWvwhwrsXo1lgM33mw5hrHzmdcRSLCbROMms4ZcnruG6Xs XMjuY5QrtyEawM5ibXimoN7C+l5+bK2XVMt8IJRYW6Jd/aUOWIcN3RkQ+EpUNFQi3zt6 mbZHbrHL7hj/2Rl+bwh6/csAsswRSZgweTBPeSyX2y2JEytpzU6sfSR+yHexQy5XE8Sw VtSqVsztWBmywBgDlIRUa8/chnZZdU+y2ZhpEFKBXAAmNCRJ3n6u+X4l4T6Ldv3mJVRk lXQ1FtnpBdp4tQP52Yf8JDFPNhRT/2PQmuiXurdmp+sWC/WfM6sz2cxTxj6D9+tSOUxL gFMg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV0WzP9eEZ26Z6D+i2o060HM9xtQLP65VYla/ImAi//eqt3iIsdSBVH2MQ7cC64taEWA1WpAJeNdVtL@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFB57gNLV5kgcK5x96+x4r7/uNUg7fPlAZPfMJO6Ka/KETYWGa UPCCwmaIw9c0ku8AbTy1EEDXEq2xw/96VR2enk0yx3LU/OOCSIFgcFMNY6gky30THYOJTRrwJye YIRzeSylN5a7j3gtiAKzV4eSrTx/jpFE= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsYrJwGhYB1RQfZGPthRHfgRcRObf24J5epKIUJA2H8XbZd9zGcS/tbWjwQJqC hDCRjr6bXQrJUB4RdoD8QTy/5bzN/LQMhD2KvOI6C44TcrmeHwi1sRTgV12yurNJy4Y3F7n3RUC Ec6pddes2TW9UQt0Yw2IMhlsHBUSktVq4TtXOKPq/f4q1UZCOsSBxifF7phy8AKLkH8gQsKgT4A OM+TAt3dEvcgetnkcWcJ1IV/jzi4OhXFuoyqFFG8XLf6xshcOwZ6JWYKA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGyBC+BBxL1KaIi5mi0ySnjGyT9eGbf3VfoXUYHbfCWS/PwYWYo/VnJObXv4/YPosnSNepi2Bx4++0gAs1GJ6k= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3f0b:b0:b73:2df0:9fa9 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-b7331aec6fcmr200176166b.59.1762939823249; Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:30:23 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20251109214515.121742-1-rpimentel.silva@gmail.com> <20251109214515.121742-2-rpimentel.silva@gmail.com> <9d48a54c-0585-4524-b9d5-30696f5ecc8b@kernel.org> <2e160fe1-bcb2-41cf-817e-ac2a36959b16@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <2e160fe1-bcb2-41cf-817e-ac2a36959b16@kernel.org> From: Daniel Baluta Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:32:44 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AWmQ_bk_gSFa8QTHeI1JrrzB0W9QZ2CPKTfJSvtyKPLDEFBLVYzLq3Nt1FpD5Yg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: add support for NXP i.MX8MP FRDM board To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Fabio Estevam , Rogerio Pimentel , robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com, dario.binacchi@amarulasolutions.com, marex@denx.de, Markus.Niebel@tq-group.com, y.moog@phytec.de, joao.goncalves@toradex.com, frieder.schrempf@kontron.de, josua@solid-run.com, francesco.dolcini@toradex.com, primoz.fiser@norik.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xiaofeng Wei , Daniel Baluta , Joseph Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 11:14=E2=80=AFAM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 12/11/2025 10:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 12/11/2025 09:15, Daniel Baluta wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:49=E2=80=AFPM Daniel Baluta wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 1:50=E2=80=AFPM Fabio Estevam wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi Daniel, > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 5:45=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Baluta wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> In addition to that, Rogerio please read: > >>>>> > >>>>> https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html > >>>>> > >>>>> At this moment I think you should keep the original author of the > >>>>> patch. > >>>> > >>>> Right, but NXP makes a total mess with authorship. > >>> > >>> I cannot disagree with you on this, let me clarify it internally with > >>> NXP colleagues > >>> and sort everything out. > >> > >> Hi Fabio & Rogerio, > >> > >> Checked internally and to track the correct authorship and development= work > >> here is how NXP would prefer to get credit. > > > > Sorry, but individual contributors do not need to give any credits to > > NXP. If NXP wanted to sent the patches to have credit, they would do it= . > > > > Did sending happened? > > > > If not, then any contributor is rightful to take the patches from > > downstream and send them only, ONLY with their authorship. That's what > > DCO allows and that's what established practice as well. > > > > NXP had a chance to upstream. When they decided not to, they forfeit an= y > > rights to claim they want any authorship. > > > > > >> > >> #Use git commit --amend --author=3D"Xiaofeng Wei " > > > > NAK, there is no single patch like that from above author: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=3Df%3Axiaofeng.wei%40nxp.com > > > > Remember, downstream code does not matter. Does not exist. > > > > > > > ... and because last two months there were two or three cases where > vendor companies bullied individual contributors, I will be quite strict > about that. Vendor company does not receive any authorship on patches > sent by independent contributors which the vendor NEVER submitted, > unless author really wants that. But I will treat any such insisting on > authorship by vendor like NXP as bullying and working AGAINST the communi= ty. I'm sorry that people use "bully" in this context. We are just trying to help with the limited time we have and create a friendly environment around NXP upstream support. We (NXP) immensely appreciate individual contributions from everyone. We need to be fair, the v1 of this patchset was taken from NXP downstream without respecting the Developer Certificate of Origin. E.g there were commits pulled in from our internal tree without keeping the S-o-B tags. As I said keeping the original author is a sign of respecting the initial work of NXP developers and a recommendation from NXP. What is your suggestion on moving on with this? Would keeping the authorship from Rogerio and adding S-o-B and C-d-b tags as above work for everyone? Daniel.