From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] PCI: generic: Add support for ARM64 and MSI(x) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 10:49:14 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1411937610-22125-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> <2430078.s4snyh5OoF@wuerfel> <20141001084626.GZ841@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <3256560.C0cZnIlnAv@wuerfel> <20141022155914.GB25939@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141022155914.GB25939@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Liviu Dudau , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "jason@lakedaemon.net" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "robh+dt@kernel.org" , "suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" , Catalin Marinas , "tglx@linutronix.de" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > ... I wonder what's the > best course of action. Putting together all the bits and pieces required > to remove PCI bios dependency from this patch can take a while, I wonder > whether we should aim for merging this driver (rebased on top of my port to the > new parse ranges API) with the ARM/ARM64 ifdeffery and clean it up later > or aim for the whole thing at once, I am just worried it can take us a while. I haven't looked at your patches, but "the whole thing at once" is never *my* goal. A gradual cleanup is just fine with me. Bjorn