Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: iio: accel: adxl345: Add spi-3wire

[Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:17 AM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:37:13AM +0000, Lothar Rubusch wrote:
> > Provide the optional spi-3wire in the example.
>
> That doesn't match the diff as you don't touch the example. But really,
> this should say why you need spi-3wire.

I understand. The change does not add anything to the example. which
is definitely wrong.
Anyway I'm unsure about this change in particular. I know the spi-3wire
binding exists and can be implemented. Not all spi devices offer it. Not all
drivers implement it. My patch set tries to implement spi-3wire for the
particular accelerometer.
Do I need to add something here to dt-bindings documentation of the
adxl345? Or, as an optional spi feature, is it covered anyway by
documentation of optional spi bindings? So, should I refrase this particular
patch or may I drop it entirely? Could you please clarify.

>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lothar Rubusch <l.rubusch@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > index 07cacc3f6..280ed479e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/accel/adi,adxl345.yaml
> > @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ properties:
> >
> >    spi-cpol: true
> >
> > +  spi-3wire: true
> > +
> >    interrupts:
> >      maxItems: 1
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >