From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ganapatrao Kulkarni Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] Documentation: arm64/arm: dt bindings for numa. Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 22:41:28 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1439570374-4079-1-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> <1439570374-4079-3-git-send-email-gkulkarni@caviumnetworks.com> <20150828123228.GE31748@leverpostej> <1440797856.2912.239.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1440797856.2912.239.camel-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , "grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "leif.lindholm-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "rfranz-YGCgFSpz5w/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "msalter-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org" , "robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "steve.capper-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "hanjun.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "al.stone-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , "arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org" , Pawel Moll , ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Ben, On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 09:02 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > >> So just keep the ibm? I'm okay with that. That would help move to >> common code. Alternatively, we could drop the vendor prefix and have >> common code just check for both. > > That wouldn't be the first time we go down that path and it makes sense > imho. > >> All points that could be asked of the IBM binding. Perhaps Arnd or >> Ben can provide some insight or know who can? > > They are part of the PAPR specification which we've been trying to get > published for a while now but that hasn't happened yet. Beware that > there are variants of the format based on some other property. There's > also > "ibm,associativity-reference-points" which is used to calculate > distances. I'll see if I can get you an excerpt of the PAPR chapter, or > reword it, in the next few days (please poke me if I drop the ball next > week). did you get a chance to write an excerpt of the PAPR chapter? please share the details. > > Cheers, > Ben. > thanks Ganapat -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html