From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A8EC43463 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED0021734 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 20:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="r5aGYz+r" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726154AbgIRUuu (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:50:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726118AbgIRUuu (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x233.google.com (mail-oi1-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B78C0613CE; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x233.google.com with SMTP id i17so8573853oig.10; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LQBTYd/i7TL56jJTVQHkU8FPXDKYu/R4V8hCfAPSzJo=; b=r5aGYz+rFyzfIoItLLPRg0TWqJvXc782/dbNt7PSwOTmfECPgbPftiexIoJkmFTXtY vK4UuJdscGwkJgnTX/t8tlx9Z7Q/eOVC0jbIuSuj/58XQV9sWNdOS+A82CTSgiMta/u7 uWQ/AYufjXogcJQpODpjD2prPYEWNCRPkks3c2V8pRp4Vv1LgYC+cVsE+kJPPCw0FBj7 U3e2A6CFjMd12j5aCHGLnlMRvVRHngzVR0UYL7Y7dNZk8OYyal5IYSmOiSEQuNazDCAR Qh+MUj5CCTduEz3ESmgu6tb6KIFSCO6DgMyIbu4nv4eveg7nFsKcRcOce2Ou2wCbVKqy bBfw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LQBTYd/i7TL56jJTVQHkU8FPXDKYu/R4V8hCfAPSzJo=; b=XKLs9W4Qm2C/RipJ/HAiiZvKFtnyoKja2BlyCiVzA5RRLjU5rgw9QwLrTcpbBM0PRU bn/5PnPcp+b4cY+scWrMFpmvl2FEvKOY+dTkRDXGTda49QRiuiYtRyqehnDGQgXLrnS/ m666k5ibdbFD8dXLAgVCAsMVZWIuVNZ5Rzh5nashvRaEnAZ+9+hGjT1og85OaBFFGZjs uXvYCEMD+YOmt/TXxUIIFlVvMxhvWr0JyUtgS0Yf5uTgsiFJUf61wyelEideh7EEby+k 1azxlVgF4KEsxx+TUe/A3gxy9sLbHp4l8PXTYJ0HjwkzIUV3VcEX55KAtumQsiOURS2Q Lzrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mH74Hn2fVdyNFayw5eYeDPODHUc+FBWSGzzqgy0b98FT9/jh2 OV6ZdjUkGZe13w+wuLP7IiyJBUbqdXHfjeXauXw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLFCTn89gsNeMXFYjEgZOXfTDO437610Y8/ZpvSrOdjvvz3QGyVx9hb5/bIum5U6OkxJE/NlABUGT6UuwFT+0= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5b45:: with SMTP id p66mr11082126oib.39.1600462249606; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:50:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200910172826.3074357-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> <20200910172826.3074357-4-enric.balletbo@collabora.com> In-Reply-To: From: Enric Balletbo Serra Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 22:50:37 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8173 power domain controller To: Fabien Parent Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra , linux-kernel , Collabora Kernel ML , Matthias Brugger , Nicolas Boichat , Hsin-Yi Wang , Weiyi Lu , Rob Herring , DTML , Linux ARM , "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Fabien, Thank you to look at this. Missatge de Fabien Parent del dia dv., 18 de set. 2020 a les 22:24: > > Hi Enric, > > > - scpsys: power-controller@10006000 { > > - compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-scpsys"; > > - #power-domain-cells = <1>; > > This change generates a lot of warning when compiling the MT8173 device-trees. > > Warning (power_domains_property): /soc/mutex@14020000: Missing > property '#power-domain-cells' in node /soc/syscon@10006000 or bad > phandle (referred from power-domains[0]) I think that there is a mistake in that patch #power-domain-cells = <1>; should not be removed. Anyway, I talked with Matthias and I'm going to redefine this part as doesn't really match with the hardware. We're thinking on something like this: scpsys: syscon@10006000 { compatible = "mediatek,mtk-scpsys", "syscon"; reg = ... power-controller { compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-power-controller"; #power-domain-cells = <1>; <- the list of domains -> Thanks, Enric