From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F003C00140 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 18:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242570AbiHOSjU (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:39:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50608 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242021AbiHOSid (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:38:33 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1135.google.com (mail-yw1-x1135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1135]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89A673CBC9 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1135.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-3321c2a8d4cso40475477b3.5 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:23:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=Db07G664QdLJL7hbwp7/beOMmf/kBhPqwkUaOy2LwyA=; b=Di5ahuQuUij88dNg/KRUmAKM+aFc4DdrWzvkGo1ivcBnErb9f9it3ced1tX8E1HOnW rLig4vd67w+IDyEGKnA/hiBFKa9SIJo5ovpK9oXEVP3+LRX4wdHl8OBPIMq1rc/4kQNy rLg4IV9NvfkwSDqTHNxE49YD7M/s3X5ncxvBEWc9+/vl3EoxqEMe1PMLKgVLDHqstm4G joJwp2cMBAozP1CUx+KJTNs7dLtt12cRxqdp9lmed/H3XsNHEmXKmwhjuo5TeIJHjYNH eTAkc55YhPGHXbscGy9mPpSlEynn8yRw1Pw5EJDngyR94hoEJzRHIGRMOuHmABb4er0F FE6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=Db07G664QdLJL7hbwp7/beOMmf/kBhPqwkUaOy2LwyA=; b=Gcaw1vxkNaDLuvTttNxSYWuVtMA5EmIJdB/28dmKnVq73vpMDzYUTh8K9e1Ruh3a6N h8uuDmtAY+LG78kZfKGC0SlbVzzVA6XO8WRXlZsXfgNMqqFhMGNwMJoV8IrfZGJ/aZ44 S7V/6ANgv2/1ifZO7jkt688QRuRSDNKOM4lBwI4mb6Q24nG05IjNjZtQcy4oTZq1SMhm aEzlVzct9+Z1xuiF1ffkzO5pF2gT83RVp7aLLjk9g0uKknqLTFM07lUYV9HcLc+kHEdh Nd6KMJ1Hr2rDJ3riTpCw9utU5NIdkJDA855AJU8L9o9aeJN96JqEN+aIzUuce7FShRtz uGvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3/basflMnY/um47R00DbL3JksA/CKt2ELdGZ0Vgcy8BaAlUgeQ HyOOuuxCsZmixeBXuBTRp5zzQgglBzf+NOceWFR7SA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4wzhsMjeR70OWMz+XaTgfrMhs+/iH3OP2Hd6MDBv3+PPxfDZUE0dnmuD2HQ3WDLtnmiP5GDkAha3prRqse7F4= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d353:0:b0:67b:7758:b051 with SMTP id e80-20020a25d353000000b0067b7758b051mr11716143ybf.563.1660587826134; Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:23:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220810060040.321697-1-saravanak@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Saravana Kannan Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 11:23:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] fw_devlink improvements To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Len Brown , Abel Vesa , Alexander Stein , Sudeep Holla , Geert Uytterhoeven , John Stultz , Doug Anderson , Guenter Roeck , kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 3:33 AM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Saravana Kannan [220813 00:45]: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 2:49 AM Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > * Saravana Kannan [220810 05:54]: > > > > Tony, > > > > > > > > This should handle the odd case of the child being the supplier of the > > > > parent. Can you please give this a shot? I want to make sure the cycle > > > > detection code handles this properly and treats it like it's NOT a cycle. > > > > > > Yup, this series works for me, so feel free to add: > > > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren > > > > Thanks for testing! > > > > Btw, out of curiosity, how many different boards did you test this on? > > IIRC you had an issue only in one board, right? Not to say I didn't > > break anything else, I'm just trying to see how much confidence we > > have on this series so far. I'm hoping the rest of the folks I listed > > in the email will get around to testing this series. > > Sorry if I was not clear earlier. The issue affects several generations > of TI 32-bit SoCs at least, not just one board. But this series fixes the issues for all of them or are you still seeing some broken boot with this series? -Saravana > > > > I have some concerns though on how do we get a working -rc1 with the > > > earlier series applied? See the comments in the last patch of this > > > series. > > > > I tried to reply, but not sure if it helps. We'll continue the discussion there. > > Ack. > > Tony > > -- > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@android.com. >