From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 2/9] iio: adc: add support for X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs ADCs Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:52:47 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170320081653.8884-1-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170320081653.8884-3-quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com> <20170323093527.ojcdpvruzqnhvysq@earth> Reply-To: wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20170323093527.ojcdpvruzqnhvysq@earth> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , Jonathan Cameron , Quentin Schulz , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Ripard , knaack.h-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org, Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald-Stadler , Lee Jones , Icenowy Zheng , Liam Breck , Thomas Petazzoni , "open list:THERMAL" , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel , linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 12:34:45PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> P.S. I'm thinking about having MFD_AXP20X imply its various sub-drivers. >> Not sure if that was the intended usage of the new imply syntax though. > > I think adding "default MFD_AXP20X" to the sub-drivers is cleaner, > as you will not end up with a long list. I'd still need to add imply statements for the various subsystems though, like regulators, power supplies, extcon, etc.. But I suppose that's cleaner, and fits the original intent of the syntax. ChenYu