From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: sun8i: a83t: Rename pinmux setting names Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:16:53 +0800 Message-ID: References: <20170418042205.27894-1-wens@csie.org> <20170418042205.27894-4-wens@csie.org> <20170418090447.dcxinewczubf26b7@lukather> Reply-To: wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20170418090447.dcxinewczubf26b7@lukather> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22:05PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The pinmux setting nodes all have an address element in their node >> names, however the pinctrl node does not have #address-cells. >> >> Rename the existing pinmux setting nodes and labels in sun8i-a83t.dtsi, >> dropping identifiers for functions that only have one possible setting, >> and using the pingroup name if the function is identically available on >> different pingroups. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > > Applied, and I really like the new names. > > Would you make the same patch for everyone? I can. No guarantees on the schedule though. ChenYu