From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chen-Yu Tsai Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] dt-bindings: panel: Add Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 ICN6211 MIPI-DSI to RGB bridge Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 21:36:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20181023155035.9101-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181023155035.9101-11-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <20181024180754.pfae27y6i7jhcdgy@flea> Reply-To: wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20181024180754.pfae27y6i7jhcdgy@flea> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Jagan Teki Cc: Maxime Ripard , Icenowy Zheng , Jernej Skrabec , Vasily Khoruzhick , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , David Airlie , dri-devel , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , linux-clk , Michael Trimarchi , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:08 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:20:30PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 ICN6211 is 800x480, 4-lane MIPI-DSI to RGB bridge panel, > > the same panel PCB comes with parallel RBG which is supported via > > panel-simple driver with "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible. > > > > But this binding is specific for MIPI DSI to RGB bridge panels, > > which usually accessed using MIPI DSI controller driver. > > > > for information: > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible for parallel RGB panels > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16-icn6211" compatible for MIPI-DSI to RGB > > bridge panels > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > > Why not just reusing the same binding document? Agreed. Just put the MIPI-DSI-specific information you added here into the existing document. Rob suggested that we could even use the same compatible. That would make sense if you are modelling the entire panel + PCB as a module, instead of a panel node + a bridge node as I originally wanted. Don't worry, I gave it some thought and I think having a single combined panel node makes more sense. ChenYu