From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C370C4338F for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7A861107 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 10:16:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240164AbhHEKRJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 06:17:09 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40524 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240126AbhHEKRI (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Aug 2021 06:17:08 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB284C061765; Thu, 5 Aug 2021 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id mt6so7536358pjb.1; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uxYTdS6bgnfx+2Ini0fwp3kDF4xi+vc1vXsFnljggKE=; b=JtEg/md2Yb41+lcJXe0vA8ZSpStUi8dmGPgMckSn8GNINukwB+ruPr97a/iHlXfhPz tAalqCJiLpoS195wRcmC8yJvRMyKPo/YkNrM9NUBQ2qlfOc32ztPM7YldPLNnk3r+PeA jdJ1aVLKQrfpCupHt43bipmklPq+GVI+oImgws/r3M096q3leCRSbAFXiiW5+twDCZ5a C5vHVCdnP1TIvdOukQbc6Mi22tGiMGQ2oTQe3tyyEN92JHvwC4mFFCg/DNPGApK+EZmt 0x+2mcC8l2PXBFQ9R22X/soj19riBMzXr/o7Vz5pLl1imicG2uHNDO4TwmW2gvW7T3+Y ybbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uxYTdS6bgnfx+2Ini0fwp3kDF4xi+vc1vXsFnljggKE=; b=ftT7NwwPdUbMlztzUDZ/EuSFmoR6efKuakVm4VjXldSQzb7DP8luFOQgBnVAuDKaWI BfLKT7psWwsmdyl2CjZ8bBAL/BL089Cvd2+PF2EQkP+80LWceLsBpyCBxJF9Fgkjauo8 rcOgx2D6qTRu5DWWG3hf/+bYHOyMvufvVTT4QE4vQKa7KbvXDGPpEe+zM/K+416W8Zpt ne3l7AnF5n/JL9HumHHJ/cHrrdg78dv9X76Gt++TRu1aC3QiHN/OKCw0pI0k/hNLvrOF gFYRQ2gB4zbuvYkjxxN0fwYSARktZ8A0FHpTaTuf543luQxnenFL3u875Q+m3hcj1jYs lpfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dCWFOWJY+ZzwpKdeFr/haCxa0b7OSXeDYSVnag9n1yytAYAbU pytcWslV9/3XO3zeKGUghNz3mfmCuUaENPwAOuE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQdp79YDSUT7pRlIuSy1Usr2PJofPj14rvaki1F07Zhcat3klZF8hM1ON/1nirWpPekkeKplXaq4gQ26K/OTY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:33c5:: with SMTP id lk5mr14831776pjb.129.1628158614242; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1627098243-2742-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1627098243-2742-1-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 13:16:14 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Add ilitek ili9341 panel driver To: dillon.minfei@gmail.com Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Thierry Reding , Sam Ravnborg , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Rob Herring , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Torgue , Maxime Coquelin , =?UTF-8?Q?Noralf_Tr=C3=B8nnes?= , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm Mailing List , dri-devel , devicetree , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:46 AM wrote: > > From: Dillon Min > > Since the st,sf-tc240t-9370-t dts binding already exist in stm32f429-disco.dts > but, the panel driver didn't get accepted from mainline. it's time to submit > patch fot it. > > This driver can support two different interface by different dts bindings: > - spi+dpi, use spi to configure register, dpi for graphic data. > st,sf-tc240t-9370-t > - only spi, just like tiny/ili9341.c (actually, this part is copy from tiny) > adafruit,yx240qv29 ... > I was submited the first patch last year, you can find it at [1]. submitted > this patch has one major difference from that one, which is replace the low > level communication way, from spi_sync() to mipi_dbi_{command, > command_stackbuf}() interface, referred from Linus's patch [2]. Can you shed a light on the road map here. I have the SPI panel (tiny) based on the ILI9341 and I'm using actually mi0283qt driver. With yours we will have 3 (three!) drivers for the same chip. I really do not want this. Without road map on the prospective of these all drivers, NAK. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko