Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] dt-bindings: edac: nuvoton: add NPCM memory controller

[Medad Young <medadyoung@gmail.com>]

Dear Paul,

Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> 於 2022年5月18日 週三 下午12:33寫道：
>
> Dear Medad,
>
>
> Am 16.05.22 um 04:30 schrieb Medad Young:
>
> > Paul Menzel 於 2022年5月10日 週二 下午2:14寫道：
>
> >> Am 10.05.22 um 05:10 schrieb Medad CChien:
> >>> Document devicetree bindings for the Nuvoton BMC NPCM memory controller.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Medad CChien <ctcchien@nuvoton.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    .../edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml  | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>    1 file changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >>>    create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..6f37211796a3
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> >>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> >>> +%YAML 1.2
> >>> +---
> >>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/edac/nuvoton,npcm-memory-controller.yaml#
> >>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> >>> +
> >>> +title: Nuvoton NPCM Memory Controller
> >>> +
> >>> +maintainers:
> >>> +  - Medad CChien <ctcchien@nuvoton.com>
> >>
> >> Just a side note, that in my experience functional like
> >> <linux-npcm-memory-controller@nuvoton.com> instead of personal addresses
> >> are useful, as you can configure on your side, who to deliver messages
> >> to. For example, if you are on sick leave or vacation, you just
> >> configure to deliver the message to a colleague of yours (or they get
> >> messages in the first place anyway).
> >>
> >> Maybe you can bring that up at Nuvoton.
> >
> > I understand, but we do not have group email  address.
> > so maybe I should add more maintainers?
>
> If there are actually more maintainers, responsible and knowledgeable
> for that driver, than yes, these should be added (until you get a
> function address set up).
>

OK, thanks

>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul

B.R.
Medad