From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] power: supply: max17040: Send uevent in SOC and status change Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 17:00:06 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20190527022258.32748-1-matheus@castello.eng.br> <20190527022258.32748-6-matheus@castello.eng.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190527022258.32748-6-matheus@castello.eng.br> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matheus Castello Cc: sre@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, Chanwoo Choi , =?UTF-8?B?QmFydMWCb21pZWogxbtvxYJuaWVya2lld2ljeg==?= , lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 27 May 2019 at 04:23, Matheus Castello wrote: > > Notify core through power_supply_changed() in case of changes in state > of charge and power supply status. This is useful for user-space to > efficiently update current battery level. > > Signed-off-by: Matheus Castello > --- > drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c > index 61e6fcfea8a1..34278845cfe5 100644 > --- a/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/max17040_battery.c > @@ -176,6 +176,9 @@ static void max17040_get_online(struct i2c_client *client) > static void max17040_get_status(struct i2c_client *client) > { > struct max17040_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client); > + int last_status; > + > + last_status = chip->status; > > if (!chip->pdata || !chip->pdata->charger_online > || !chip->pdata->charger_enable) { > @@ -194,6 +197,9 @@ static void max17040_get_status(struct i2c_client *client) > > if (chip->soc > MAX17040_BATTERY_FULL) > chip->status = POWER_SUPPLY_STATUS_FULL; > + > + if (last_status != chip->status) > + power_supply_changed(chip->battery); Why splitting it from max17040_work()? It seems logical to check soc and status at the same time. Best regards, Krzysztof > } > > static void max17040_get_of_data(struct max17040_chip *chip) > @@ -217,10 +223,18 @@ static void max17040_check_changes(struct i2c_client *client) > static void max17040_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct max17040_chip *chip; > + int last_soc; > > chip = container_of(work, struct max17040_chip, work.work); > + > + /* store SOC for check change */ > + last_soc = chip->soc; > max17040_check_changes(chip->client); > > + /* check changes and send uevent */ > + if (chip->soc >= 0 && last_soc != chip->soc) > + power_supply_changed(chip->battery); > + > queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &chip->work, > MAX17040_DELAY); > } > -- > 2.20.1 >