From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: thermal: samsung: Add SPDX license identifier Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 18:27:59 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2442216.oppRSGRAaL@amdc3058> <20180724200312.xs6u4nvhjckukkig@kozik-lap> <2385592.z8yee4uxt4@amdc3058> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2385592.z8yee4uxt4@amdc3058> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Zhang Rui , Eduardo Valentin , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Kukjin Kim , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25 July 2018 at 16:43, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Tuesday, July 24, 2018 10:03:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:46:35PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:02:50 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> > > Replace GPL license statement with SPDX license identifier (GPL-2.0+). >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> > > --- >> > > include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h | 12 +----------- >> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h >> > > index 0646500bca69..642e4e7f4084 100644 >> > > --- a/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h >> > > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h >> > > @@ -1,19 +1,9 @@ >> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */ >> > >> > This code should be GPL-2.0 only, original license statement is most >> > likely result of using wrong file as the source of copy-paste. So I >> > would like to have the license fixed first before doing conversion to >> > SPDX. >> >> If you think that's the case, then it makes sense and please go ahead. >> As fair as I remember this required signed-off from all contributors... >> so probably just Lukasz and Eduardo? > > git blame shows just Lukasz so his Ack should be enough. > > I'm also fine with doing it in one patch like i.e. in commit a80ea4cb944e > ("pata_bk3710: clarify license version and use SPDX header"), if you are > also fine with it could you please re-spin the patch (+Cc: Lukasz)? I do not have interest in changing the license, I do not want to deal with possible legal issues so I'll skip it. I am fine however with abandoning this patch if you or someone else sends license change + SPDX. Best regards, Krzysztof