Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] riscv: dts: starfive: add Milkv Mars board device tree

[Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>]

Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 06:06:58PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > Yo,
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 07:13:48PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 09:26:00PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > > The Milkv Mars is a development board based on the Starfive JH7110 SoC.
> > > > The board features:
> > > >
> > > > - JH7110 SoC
> > > > - 1/2/4/8 GiB LPDDR4 DRAM
> > > > - AXP15060 PMIC
> > > > - 40 pin GPIO header
> > > > - 3x USB 3.0 host port
> > > > - 1x USB 2.0 host port
> > > > - 1x M.2 E-Key
> > > > - 1x eMMC slot
> > > > - 1x MicroSD slot
> > > > - 1x QSPI Flash
> > > > - 1x 1Gbps Ethernet port
> > > > - 1x HDMI port
> > > > - 1x 2-lane DSI and 1x 4-lane DSI
> > > > - 1x 2-lane CSI
> > > >
> > > > Add the devicetree file describing the currently supported features,
> > > > namely PMIC, UART, I2C, GPIO, SD card, QSPI Flash, eMMC and Ethernet.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > >
> > > Got a dtbs_check issue in the patchwork CI:
> > >
> > >   +arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-milkv-mars.dtb: gmac1-rgmii-rxin-clock: 'clock-frequency' is a required property
> > >   +	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/fixed-clock.yaml#
> > >   +arch/riscv/boot/dts/starfive/jh7110-milkv-mars.dtb: gmac1-rmii-refin-clock: 'clock-frequency' is a required property
> > >   +	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/fixed-clock.yaml#
> > >
> > > Can you fix that please? Also, I applied some patches the other day that
> > > seem to conflict quite a bit with the common board dts patch. Would you
> > > please do a rebase on top of that please?
> >
> > Been going through stuff on my todo list now that the merge window is
> > closed. Could you please resend this with the rebase done?
>
> Thanks for the reminding, I will rebase on 6.9-rc1 then send out the
> patches.

Hi Jisheng,

A rebase would be great. It looks good to me, but could you maybe call the
common .dtsi something more generic like jh7110-common.dtsi like the
jh7100-common.dtsi. If we'll see other boards based on the jh7110 upstreamed
(eg. Star64) I suspect they'll also be heavily based on^M^M^M similar to the
VF2 schematics.

/Emil

>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Conor.
>
>