Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 1/7] dt-bindings: clock: mpfs: add more MSSPLL output definitions

[Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>]

Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> There are 3 undocumented outputs of the MSSPLL that are used for the CAN
> bus, "user crypto" module and eMMC. Add their clock IDs so that they can
> be hooked up in DT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> ---
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> index 79775a5134ca..b52f19a2b480 100644
> --- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/microchip,mpfs-clock.h
> @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
>
>  #define CLK_RTCREF	33
>  #define CLK_MSSPLL	34
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL0	34

You add this new CLK_MSSPLL0 macro with the same value as CLK_MSSPLL, but
never seem to use it in this series. Did you mean to rename the CLK_MSSPLL
instances CLK_MSSPLL0?

> +#define CLK_MSSPLL1	35
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL2	36
> +#define CLK_MSSPLL3	37
> +/* 38 is reserved for MSS PLL internals */
>
>  /* Clock Conditioning Circuitry Clock IDs */
>
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv