From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Abraham Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] cpufreq: opp: Add device tree based lookup of boost mode frequency Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 23:37:58 +0530 Message-ID: References: <1401440477-4328-1-git-send-email-thomas.ab@samsung.com> <5683009.PqtetcWKuO@vostro.rjw.lan> <1430270.VsBiDfiUL9@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1430270.VsBiDfiUL9@vostro.rjw.lan> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Tomasz Figa , Lukasz Majewski , Viresh Kumar , Nishanth Menon , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:19:06 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, May 30, 2014 02:31:15 PM Thomas Abraham wrote: >> > Changes since v5: >> > - Fixes for checkpatch warnings with --strict option as suggested by >> > Nishanth Menon. >> > >> > Changes since v4: >> > - Code improvements suggested by Viresh Kumar. >> > >> > Changes since v3: >> > - Minor changes as suggested in the last version. >> > >> > Changes since v2: >> > - Reworked based on the "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP >> > layer" patch series posted by Nishanth Menon. >> > >> > Changes since v1: >> > - Boost mode frequencies are specfied as a set of frequencies instead of >> > specifying them as OPPs. Thanks to Nishanth, Lukasz and Rob for the >> > feedback. >> > >> > This series has been acked by authors and maintainers of the code >> > portions changed in this series. The new DT binding introduced in this >> > patch needs an ack from device tree binding maintainers as well. >> > >> > Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds >> > support for CPU boost mode for CPUfreq drivers. To use the new boost >> > mode, CPUfreq drivers have to specify the boost mode frequency and >> > voltage within the CPUfreq driver, which is the case for Exynos4x12 >> > CPUfreq driver. >> > >> > But for CPUfreq drivers which obtain the OPPs from cpus node, this >> > patch series adds support to specify boost mode frequencies in the >> > cpu device tree node. This requirement came up when Lukasz pointed >> > out the regression caused by the Exynos CPUfreq driver consolidation >> > patches. >> >> Both patches queued up for 3.16 in the linux-pm tree. > > But please address the Mark's comments or I'll drop them. Hi Rafael, Please drop this series for now. Both the patches have to reworked based on Mark's comments. Thanks, Thomas. > > Rafael > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html