From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bryan Wu Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:34:12 -0800 Message-ID: References: <1352731270-27534-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <1352731270-27534-2-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <50BCB391.1070305@ti.com> <50BDB016.7010908@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <50BDB016.7010908@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Richard Purdie , linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Hi Bryan, > > On 12/03/2012 07:32 PM, Bryan Wu wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: >> Actually, I'm waiting for some feedback from DT maintainers about this >> new binding. But it looks find to me. > > Would it be possible to have the first (or even better the first two) patch > going for 3.8 and we can leave the DT bindings for 3.9? > I would like to clean up, fix some of the OMAP related board files for 3.9 > which would need the patches for the leds-pwm driver itself. > What's best thing I can do is I can merge these patchset into my -devel branch, after 3.8 merge window close I will move this -devel branch to my for-next branch for 3.9 merge window. Does this make sense to you? Thanks, -Bryan