From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: [Urgent PATCH] arm64: dts: uniphier: fix IRQ trigger type of ARMv8 timer Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 11:25:30 +0900 Message-ID: References: <1470039140-3801-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> <579F05E1.9020300@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann , arm@kernel.org Cc: Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel , Marc Zyngier List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, 2016-08-01 17:26 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Hi Marc, > > 2016-08-01 17:18 GMT+09:00 Marc Zyngier : >> Please keep me cc-ed on this. > > Sorry, I automate patch-posting, but scripts/get_maintainer.pl > did not pick you up. Also, I forgot to cc you explicitly. > > >> On 01/08/16 09:12, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>> Since commit 1e2a7d78499e ("irqdomain: Don't set type when mapping >>> an IRQ"), the interrupt type is strictly checked. Without this >>> patch, this board would not boot any more. >>> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.txt >>> says that the 3rd cell should be either 1 (edge) or 4 (level) >>> depending on the trigger type. As the CA72 Generic Timer provides >>> active-low interrupts, the value of the 3rd cell should be 4. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada >>> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier >>> --- >>> Arnd, Olof, >>> >>> I guess you are about to send pull-reqs for v4.8 cycle. >>> Could you include this one in them? >>> After IRQ updates for 4.8 were merged, my board would not >>> boot at all. I consulted experts and looks like my DT >>> was wrong. >>> >>> I could do this after -rc1 is out because it is apparently a >>> bug fix, but in that case the for-next branch in ASOC will be >>> broken for me, which would make bisect-ability difficult for me. >> >> I have a patch that addresses all platforms in one go (there is really >> no point in fixing one at a time for a bug that is so widespread). >> >> I'll repost it later today. >> > > That'll be fine. > Thank you! > > > Arnd, Olof: > Please disregard this one. > Oh Dear. Did you apply this one? This was replaced with Marc'one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9254183/ Is it too late? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada