From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: RISC-V Linux Port v9 Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 23:08:02 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20170927015638.19443-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170927015638.19443-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Olof Johansson , Linux Kernel Mailing List , patches@groups.riscv.org, Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , albert@sifive.com, Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Will Deacon , Peter Zijlstra , Boqun Feng , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > As per suggestions on our v8 patch set, I've split the core architecture code > out from our drivers and would like to submit this patch set to be included > into linux-next, with the goal being to be merged in during the next merge > window. This patch set is based on 4.14-rc2, but if it's better to have it > based on something else then I can change it around. -rc2 is good, just don't rebase it any more. I'd suggest that at the point this becomes part of linux-next, you stop modifying the patches further and move to adding any additional changes as patches on top. > * I cleaned up the defconfigs -- there's actually now just one, and it's > empty. For now I think we're OK with what the kernel sets as defaults, but > I anticipate we'll begin to expand this as people start to use the port > more. The kernel defaults are not really as sensible as one would hope. Maybe go through your previous defconfig once more and pick up the items that made sense. Arnd