From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] mfd: stmpe: Use devm_*() routines Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:00:20 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20121122102710.GD4328@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20121122102710.GD4328-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Sender: "devicetree-discuss" To: Lee Jones Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, spear-devel-nkJGhpqTU55BDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 22 November 2012 15:57, Lee Jones wrote: > I'm assuming you've reversed the semantics here for >80 chars reasons? Not for 80 chars reason :) I did it to decrease nesting level of if/else statements :) -- viresh