From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC90CCA47A for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:47:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229592AbiFPRq7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:46:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229455AbiFPRq6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:46:58 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89DD242489; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:46:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D54B824F8; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCCE8C341C4; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:46:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1655401614; bh=a3Z5yeH3jen1/5E0ibGP8X9xUa5ldCFEjepDQx1NRsY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=d0kdz0DzHwhcGptroXeLu+3qcuAfPo/3Rzhf+RDVWqfzk9wL3r7PSedONUhdaY29n /nhab28u086NtFzQLMiLNQKT9iToUwMPCTJ7uN1URhP6lQfWrQSqRIT/bHh9LnBH+L /LzAzGTbtQQjAFB4gUYhmdq8g5AUJGvO6TA60GqjT4qeJJo97pi6YQceAJrZDEuTEZ vXdTjLjR8RISzkbHuEXn4dfvaUpPP+kIQHaIYHhmsLrqly8MFmM1O+L/nYJ0szcLyX veNECykkqaoNxyudT03b+jc3dvpDg83YFBGpucM9owWuShDBdKG7EnlPYftfFDs48+ cJszjRzqyIZew== Received: by mail-vs1-f47.google.com with SMTP id e20so1917515vso.4; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:46:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/P9vwCQ6EstqexlIm2+tBKm2n7oxMM36iFuPo9dSKHO9TJJr5T 8PumwXWhxSU10F/dqh8XTj1iZMHxj4ID9ezVNg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vGAqdzOalUBqekYDSJugHvCocjWd/glXnsxxGXG96fj+Wiea2ZNDAp6I7ij/DVFmUPO/pfYWyNZ3oXE7Owq1w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3d0f:b0:34b:bdd0:baef with SMTP id i15-20020a0561023d0f00b0034bbdd0baefmr2813780vsv.85.1655401613705; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:46:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1654793615-21290-1-git-send-email-radhey.shyam.pandey@amd.com> <5e5580c4d3f84b9e9ae43e1e4ae43ac0a2162a75.camel@redhat.com> <1ae6dce1-0c5c-64f0-c6a4-b0f11a82f315@linaro.org> <20220614185454.7479405c@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20220614185454.7479405c@kernel.org> From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:46:42 -0600 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] dt-bindings: net: xilinx: document xilinx emaclite driver binding To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , "Pandey, Radhey Shyam" , Paolo Abeni , "davem@davemloft.net" , "edumazet@google.com" , "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" , "Katakam, Harini" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "git (AMD-Xilinx)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:54 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:48:43 -0700 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > I have seen a mixed set of the convention for dts patches. They are following > > > both routes i.e device tree or subsystem repos provided acked from device > > > tree maintainer. If there is preference for device tree repo then I can drop > > > net-next from subject prefix and resend it for the dt repo. > > > > If you got Ack from Devicetree bindings maintainer (Rob Herring or me), > > then feel free to take it via net-next. I think, it is actually > > preferred, unless this is some fix which needs to go via DT (Rob's) tree. > > > > If you don't have these acks, then better don't take it :) unless it's > > really waiting too long on the lists. I hope it's not that case. > > GTK, thanks. I'm also often confused by the correct tree for DT patches. It is documented in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst, section II. The default is bindings should go thru subsystem trees. Given netdev's tendency to apply bindings before DT review and even semi-automated checks, but skipping standalone patches, I haven't minded picking them up. Rob