From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] of/fdt: introduce of_scan_flat_dt_subnodes and of_get_flat_dt_phandle Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 08:42:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170405123706.6081-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20170405123706.6081-3-npiggin@gmail.com> <20170406003251.533e2845@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1491425881.4166.90.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <20170406103829.67d462e1@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20170410154348.051e7a34@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170410154348.051e7a34-a5aMA/AkCkgK5Ils6ZIQy0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Nicholas Piggin Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linuxppc-dev , Frank Rowand List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Thu, 6 Apr 2017 09:09:41 -0500 > Rob Herring wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 7:38 PM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >> > Given that it's quite a small addition to of/fdt code, hopefully >> > that gives you a reasonable justification to accept it. >> > >> > If you prefer not to, that's okay, but I think we would have to carry >> > it in arch/powerpc at least for a time, because of the schedule we're >> > working to for POWER9 enablement. As a longer term item I agree with you >> > and Ben, it would be worth considering unflattening earlier. >> >> As I mentioned, keeping it in arch/powerpc I like even less. So this is fine. > > Here is the patch with the change you suggested. Can I add your > ack and send it via the powerpc tree with the change that uses > these interfaces? Acked-by: Rob Herring -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html