From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
lina.iyer@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:51:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+HSE997h4CtM-hM29t5Yhrkc0ikkfJDOUhHf3JTH-g4w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5501A1DE.9020804@linaro.org>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Catalin, Rob,
>
> do you agree with this patchset ?
There's very little to do with DT, but looks fine to me.
Rob
>
> Thanks
> -- Daniel
>
>
> On 03/03/2015 01:29 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>
>> There is a big number of cpuidle drivers for the ARM architecture.
>>
>> These drivers have been cleaned up and grouped into the drivers/cpuidle
>> directory to keep track of the changes more easily and ensure the code
>> is following the same scheme across the drivers.
>>
>> That had the benefit of simplifying the code and factor out a lot of
>> common
>> parts. Beside that, as the drivers belong to the 'drivers' directory, we
>> had
>> to split the arch specific bits and the generic code in order to keep
>> everything self contained. The platform driver paradigm was used for this
>> purpose.
>>
>> Unfortunately, this approach is now no longer accepted and a different
>> solution
>> must be provided to reach the same goal: one example is the Qualcomm
>> cpuidle
>> driver upstreaming attempt [1].
>>
>> In the meantime, ARM64 developed a generic cpuidle driver based on DT
>> definition.
>>
>> The DT definition provides an 'enable-method' to specify one of the cpu
>> operations (PSCI, ...).
>>
>> This patchset unify this driver with ARM32, using the same DT definition.
>>
>> Thanks with this patchset we can use the 'enable-method' to specify a cpu
>> operations, hence get rid of the platform driver approach and go further
>> in the
>> cpuidle driver flexibility via the DT.
>>
>> Daniel Lezcano (6):
>> ARM: cpuidle: Remove duplicate header inclusion
>> ARM: cpuidle: Add a cpuidle ops structure to be used for DT
>> ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function
>> ARM64: cpuidle: Rename cpu_init_idle to a common function name
>> ARM64: cpuidle: Remove arm64 reference
>> ARM: cpuidle: Enable the ARM64 driver for both ARM32/ARM64
>>
>> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 12 +++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h | 3 +
>> arch/arm/kernel/cpuidle.c | 87
>> +++++++++++++++++++++-
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/cpuidle.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sl.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6sx.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/cpuidle44xx.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra20.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpuidle-tegra30.c | 1 -
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 9 ++-
>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig | 7 +-
>> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm | 10 +++
>> drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm64 | 13 ----
>> drivers/cpuidle/Makefile | 5 +-
>> drivers/cpuidle/{cpuidle-arm64.c => cpuidle-arm.c} | 38 +++++-----
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-at91.c | 1 -
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-exynos.c | 1 -
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-kirkwood.c | 1 -
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c | 1 -
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-zynq.c | 1 -
>> 22 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/cpuidle_ops.h
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig.arm64
>> rename drivers/cpuidle/{cpuidle-arm64.c => cpuidle-arm.c} (72%)
>>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 12:29 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: cpuidle: Remove duplicate header inclusion Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 17:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: cpuidle: Add a cpuidle ops structure to be used for DT Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-16 18:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-17 11:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-16 22:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-17 11:29 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-18 1:14 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-03-18 8:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 17:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Replace cpu_suspend by the common ARM/ARM64 function Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 18:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 21:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Remove arm64 reference Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1425385777-14766-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM64: cpuidle: Rename cpu_init_idle to a common function name Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1425385777-14766-5-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2015-03-13 18:22 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-14 11:41 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-15 16:26 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-20 16:01 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-20 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-03 12:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: cpuidle: Enable the ARM64 driver for both ARM32/ARM64 Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-12 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: cpuidle: Unify the ARM64/ARM DT approach Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 18:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-03-13 21:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-13 20:51 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2015-03-13 21:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-03-15 16:48 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-03-13 17:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-03-13 17:08 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL_Jsq+HSE997h4CtM-hM29t5Yhrkc0ikkfJDOUhHf3JTH-g4w@mail.gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lina.iyer@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).