From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [RFC] yamldt v0.5, now a DTS compiler too Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2017 17:00:23 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1506628736.28192.9.camel@hp800z> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1506628736.28192.9.camel@hp800z> Sender: devicetree-compiler-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Pantelis Antoniou Cc: Frank Rowand , Grant Likely , David Gibson , Tom Rini , Franklin S Cooper Jr , Matt Porter , Simon Glass , Phil Elwell , Geert Uytterhoeven , Marek Vasut , Devicetree Compiler , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hello again, > > Significant progress has been made on yamldt and is now capable of > not only generating yaml from DTS source but also compiling DTS sources > and being almost fully compatible with DTC. Can you quantify "almost"? > Compiling the kernel's DTBs using yamldt is as simple as using a > DTC=yamldt. Good. > > Error reporting is accurate and validation against a YAML based schema > works as well. In a short while I will begin posting patches with > fixes on bindings and DTS files in the kernel. What I would like to see is the schema format posted for review. I would also like to see the bindings for top-level compatible strings (aka boards) as an example. That's something that's simple enough that I'd think we could agree on a format and start moving towards defining board bindings that way. Rob