Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional clock

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:13 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:48:07 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:35:04PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:02:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > The pw-bot commands are a netdev+bpf thing :) They won't do anything
> > > > to dt patchwork. IOW the pw-bot is a different bot than the one that
> > > > replies when patch is applied.
> > >
> > > Rob's recently added it to our patchwork too.
> >
> > And the issue is that both PW projects might get updated and both don't
> > necessarily want the same state (like this case). So we need to
> > distinguish. Perhaps like one of the following:
> >
> > dt-pw-bot: <state>
> >
> > or
> >
> > pw-bot: <project> <state>
>
> We crossed replies, do you mind
>
>   pw-bot: xyz [project]
>
> ? I like the optional param after required, and the brackets may help
> us disambiguate between optional params if there are more in the future.

That's fine. Though it will be optional for you, but not us? We have
to ignore tags without the project if tags intended for netdev are
continued without the project. Or does no project mean I want to
update every project?

I also considered looking at who the email is from and restricting it
to the maintainers. I know the netdev one doesn't do that either
because I used it a couple of times. :) It does seem like it could be
abused.

Rob