From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Removing full paths from DT full_name Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 18:15:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170725214427.25768-1-robh@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170725214427.25768-1-robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , linuxppc-dev Cc: "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Frank Rowand , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > This series is the last steps to remove storing the full path for every > DT node. Instead, we can create full path strings dynamically as needed > with printf %pOF specifiers (commit ce4fecf1fe15). There are a number of > remaining direct users of full_name after this series. I don't believe > there should be any functional impact for those users with the change to > only the node name (+unit-address). The majority are for struct > resource.name. This should only affect /proc/iomem display. > > Patches 1 and 2 can be applied now for 4.14. For patches 3 and 4, my > target is 4.15 after all the dependencies have been merged. > > PPC folks, Please test! The PPC parts are untested. A git branch with > all the dependencies is here[1]. PPC folks, any chance to test this? Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html