devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/2] gpio: Support for shared GPIO lines on boards
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:12:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK-eqoyU7RWiVXMpPZ8BfT8a0WB47756s8AUtyOqbkPXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191030120440.3699-1-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 7:03 AM Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The shared GPIO line for external components tends to be a common issue and
> there is no 'clean' way of handling it.
>
> I'm aware of the GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE flag, which must be provided when
> a driver tries to request a GPIO which is already in use.
> However the driver must know that the component is going to be used in such a
> way, which can be said to any external components with GPIO line, so in theory
> all drivers must set this flag when requesting the GPIO...
>
> But with the GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE all clients have full control of the
> GPIO line. For example any device using the same GPIO as reset/enable line can
> reset/enable other devices, which is not something the other device might like
> or can handle.
> For example a device needs to be configured after it is enabled, but some other
> driver would reset it while handling the same GPIO -> the device is not
> operational anymmore as it lost it's configuration.
>
> With the gpio-shared gpiochip we can overcome this by giving the gpio-shared
> the role of making sure that the GPIO line only changes state when it will not
> disturb any of the clients sharing the same GPIO line.

Why can't we just add a shared flag like we have for interrupts?
Effectively, we have that for resets too, it's just hardcoded in the
the drivers.

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-30 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-30 12:04 [RFC v2 0/2] gpio: Support for shared GPIO lines on boards Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 12:04 ` [RFC v2 1/2] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding document for shared GPIO Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 12:04 ` [RFC v2 2/2] gpio: Add new driver for handling 'shared' gpio lines on boards Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 13:12 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2019-10-30 13:32   ` [RFC v2 0/2] gpio: Support for shared GPIO " Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 13:51     ` Philipp Zabel
2019-10-30 14:03       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 14:17     ` Mark Brown
2019-10-30 14:31       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-10-30 18:49         ` Rob Herring
2019-10-31  8:01           ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-01 13:46             ` Rob Herring
2019-11-01 15:21               ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-04 19:11                 ` Rob Herring
2019-11-05  9:58                   ` Linus Walleij
2019-11-05 11:15                     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-05 12:15                     ` Grygorii Strashko
2019-11-05 12:32                       ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-05 18:07                         ` Grygorii Strashko
2019-11-06  9:23                           ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-06 10:00                             ` Philipp Zabel
2019-11-05 12:17                   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2019-11-18 12:15 ` Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
2019-11-18 13:38   ` Philipp Zabel
2019-11-18 14:00   ` Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL_JsqK-eqoyU7RWiVXMpPZ8BfT8a0WB47756s8AUtyOqbkPXA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).