From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9F8C432BE for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2D3613B1 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230141AbhHWOxV (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:53:21 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42010 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230166AbhHWOxU (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 10:53:20 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C04F6613B3; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:52:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1629730353; bh=95kSV68n0dpCCRUmMY5PPrmt84oo0wFMRjTfsjZdteg=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=Ik7GtlWL3XwZ6jqLY8wD2dMPkqgIADw9+NOe1Mw5Y9wL8Ob1L1ZWO55L8QppisdbM jRutPdbSED+7HzgxY5p7UqIxkqo7sV3d+DokWvYAnWL07BEyC6Co5Qyn55QZoRMLNa feDAaHy5RcNjkEFxYgjtQM24FqzUXGPPhI1lwyANIWvlbXDR0xTPGuHBMXDJx1ovKK Ly93dRR3jtoGZCR271SrqRHy4l1rU1KxApzZdoQZ+kyslZfHy+Bz5iEQ39/1tHo8j2 Jx6GXTFn1SWeGIZtN1/iHz73LBrRrTzlzKHXoCaTx7/RZljk1jUt/UeXL1SUD8itXh narNQBH53/f5Q== Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id d6so26634310edt.7; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:52:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vHeMvIfdzF9sj4RHXO24ywLE1doEPn6/YAII4j9NC/PUlxWz4 GQAjz0govhh+3VJBf8s9t3tQDYVUQlMoUtE0Dg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1bCMbL4YGtSLOxVSdg1ups6Ob2RljDGjUf8dlwlp/X6+ZF3IAe5w4+7XIcmdRLOHvmaJrv6lkF74HB0qCbkE= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c487:: with SMTP id m7mr18233689edq.62.1629730352256; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 07:52:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Rob Herring Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 09:52:20 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] Add generic support for kdump DT properties To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Russell King , Nicolas Pitre , Ard Biesheuvel , Linus Walleij , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Nick Kossifidis , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Frank Rowand , Dave Young , Baoquan He , Vivek Goyal , Mike Rapoport , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux ARM , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , linux-riscv , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Linux-Renesas , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 5:13 AM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 5:25 PM Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:50:58AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > This patch series adds generic support for parsing DT properties related > > > to crash dump kernels ("linux,elfcorehdr" and "linux,elfcorehdr" under > > > the "/chosen" node), makes use of it on arm32, and performs a few > > > cleanups. It is an evolution of the combination of [1] and [2]. > > > > The DT bits look fine to me. How do you expect this to be merged? I'm > > happy to take it if arch maintainers can ack it. > > I had hoped you could take the series... My current thought is I'll take 2-5, 7 and 8 given that's what I have acks for and the others can be applied independently. > > > The series consists of 6 parts: > > > 1. Patch 1 prepares architecture-specific code (needed for MIPS only) > > > to avoid duplicating elf core header reservation later. > > > 2. Patch 2 prepares the visibility of variables used to hold > > > information retrieved from the DT properties. > > > 3. Patches 3-5 add support to the FDT core for handling the > > > properties. > > > This can co-exist safely with architecture-specific handling, until > > > the latter has been removed. > > > > Looks like patch 5 doesn't have any dependencies with the series? > > Indeed. So you can take it independently. > > > > 4. Patch 6 removes the non-standard handling of "linux,elfcorehdr" on > > > riscv. > > > > I thought this should be applied for 5.14? > > Me too, but unfortunately that hasn't happened yet... Buried in the middle of this series is not going to encourage it to be picked up as a fix. Rob