From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
kernel-team@android.com, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] of: dynamic: Fix overlayed devices not probing because of fw_devlink
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 07:54:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKRVVNzgQk6PETfJ9RrDuzT1CTjHWW02Twc_T4C82t__Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240411235623.1260061-3-saravanak@google.com>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 6:56 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
>
> When an overlay is applied, if the target device has already probed
> successfully and bound to a device, then some of the fw_devlink logic
> that ran when the device was probed needs to be rerun. This allows newly
> created dangling consumers of the overlayed device tree nodes to be
> moved to become consumers of the target device.
>
> Fixes: 1a50d9403fb9 ("treewide: Fix probing of devices in DT overlays")
> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAMuHMdXEnSD4rRJ-o90x4OprUacN_rJgyo8x6=9F9rZ+-KzjOg@mail.gmail.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240221095137.616d2aaa@bootlin.com/
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240312151835.29ef62a0@bootlin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> ---
> drivers/base/core.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> drivers/of/overlay.c | 15 +++++++++
> include/linux/fwnode.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
> index 5f4e03336e68..1a646f393dd7 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/core.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static bool fw_devlink_drv_reg_done;
> static bool fw_devlink_best_effort;
> static struct workqueue_struct *device_link_wq;
>
> +#define get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode) get_device((fwnode)->dev)
I think it is better to not have this wrapper. We want it to be clear
when we're acquiring a ref. I know get_device() does that, but I have
to look up what get_dev_from_fwnode() does exactly.
Side note: I didn't know fwnode has a ptr to the struct device. I
wonder if we can kill off of_find_device_by_node() using that. That's
for platform devices though.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-12 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 23:56 [PATCH v3 0/2] fw_devlink overlay fix Saravana Kannan
2024-04-11 23:56 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] Revert "treewide: Fix probing of devices in DT overlays" Saravana Kannan
2024-04-11 23:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] of: dynamic: Fix overlayed devices not probing because of fw_devlink Saravana Kannan
2024-04-12 12:54 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-04-12 14:28 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-04-15 1:06 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-17 6:28 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-04-23 8:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] fw_devlink overlay fix Herve Codina
2024-07-12 13:34 ` Herve Codina
2024-04-24 13:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAL_JsqKRVVNzgQk6PETfJ9RrDuzT1CTjHWW02Twc_T4C82t__Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).