From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 45/50] drivers/of: Avoid recursively calling unflatten_dt_node() Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2015 20:33:13 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1446642770-4681-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1446642770-4681-46-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1449446087.21036.1.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <5664ED0C.6060706@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5664ED0C.6060706@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Michael Ellerman , aik@ozlabs.ru, Bjorn Helgaas , Grant Likely , Pantelis Antoniou , Frank Rowand List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 12/06/2015 03:54 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 14:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>> >>> >>> Do you plan to respin the OF parts at least soon? There's another >>> problem Guenter found that of_fdt_unflatten_tree is not re-entrant due >>> to "depth" being static and this series fixes that. So I'd rather >>> apply this and avoid adding a mutex if possible. >> >> >> Gavin is on vacation until next year. >> > > That is a bit more than the timeline I am looking for. > > Rob, any chance to accept my patch for now ? After all, it can be > reverted after the rework is complete, and it would be easier > to apply to earlier kernels. Yes, will do. It's only 4.1 and later that it should be marked for stable? Rob