From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] dts: include documentation for the RISC-V interrupt controllers
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 14:57:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKtFVdSkW+4Ph2nPpcepoNWiYYCcsd0nnXReFshdrhwSg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170523004107.536-1-palmer@dabbelt.com> <20170606230007.19101-1-palmer@dabbelt.com>
 <20170606230007.19101-9-palmer@dabbelt.com> <CAMuHMdWYNVvh4hqDrqYNe2oyVHkCbH15VfWTWHaBCeRAaf6O4g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170607101343.GC29370@leverpostej> <CAMgXwTiz0jXgSw=veJ3O7xzVgm==YisZZLWpZFH7aJMXV4j7qA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMgXwTiz0jXgSw=veJ3O7xzVgm==YisZZLWpZFH7aJMXV4j7qA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Wesley Terpstra <wesley@sifive.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Albert Ou <albert@sifive.com>, patches@groups.riscv.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:57 PM, Wesley Terpstra <wesley@sifive.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>>> > +RISC-V Hart-Level Interrupt Controller (HLIC)
>>> > +---------------------------------------------

[...]

>>> > +       plic: interrupt-controller@c000000 {
>>> > +               #address-cells = <0>;
>>
>> This can go, given you don't have sub-nodes, nor a #size-cells property.
>
> The device-tree-specification seems to indicate that this is mandatory
> for an interrupt-controller. Or have I understood this wrongly? When
> you use interrupts-extended, doesn't it use the address-cells of the
> interrupt controller? We should add that size-cells = 0, though.

It's only needed if you have an interrupt-map property AIUI.
#size-cells should never be needed (unless you have child nodes of
this one).

Rob