From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/5] of: move of_parse_phandle() Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 19:32:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1376515632-12594-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <1376515632-12594-2-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <5220FC13.4070708@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5220FC13.4070708@wwwdotorg.org> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Warren Cc: Linus Walleij , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 08/28/2013 01:30 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> >>> From: Stephen Warren >>> >>> Move of_parse_phandle() after __of_parse_phandle_with_args(), since a >>> future patch will call __of_parse_phandle_with_args() from >>> of_parse_phandle(). Moving the function avoids adding a prototype. Doing >>> the move separately highlights the code changes separately. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren >>> Acked-by: Mark Rutland >>> --- >>> v5: New patch. >> >> Still no feedback from Rob || Grant on this quite important cleanup? >> >> I would like to nominate Stephen Warren as co-maintainer of >> drivers/of/*, he definately knows his way around the code. >> I'm just worried that he may not accept due to a lot of work in the >> bindings already. > > I would prefer not to be flooded with any more email. That said, > /swapping/ my DT binding reviewer position with a drivers/of reviewer > position would reduce the email load. I would be happy with your help either way. But don't get your hopes up, drivers/of is not much of a relief from the flood of DT bindings. :) Rob