From: Abhilash Kesavan <kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
"inderpal.s@samsung.com" <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
"mark.rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
robh+dt <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>,
skon.hwang@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add generic cpu power control functions for all exynos based SoCs
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 15:42:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM4voamSNYZ_hsjF3eZhqZ=FF__39tFgi5FeXRcUhRbYYzu0LQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <019b01cf6e52$75e1a710$61a4f530$@samsung.com>
Hi Kukjin,
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Abhilash Kesavan wrote:
>>
> + Jonghwan Choi, Seungkon Hwang
>
>> From: Leela Krishna Amudala <leela.krishna@linaro.org>
>>
>> Add generic cpu power control functions for exynos based SoCS
>> for cpu power up/down and to know the cpu status.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Leela Krishna Amudala <leela.krishna@linaro.org>
>
> In this case, Abhilash's signed-off-by should be added here.
Will add.
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h | 3 +++
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c | 36
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h | 6 ++++++
>> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> index 47cbab0..a7dbb5f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.h
>> @@ -63,5 +63,8 @@ struct exynos_pmu_conf {
>> };
>>
>> extern void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode);
>> +extern void exynos_cpu_powerdown(int cpu);
>
> IMO, using 'xxx_power_down' would be better.
Will change.
>
>> +extern void exynos_cpu_powerup(int cpu);
>> +extern int exynos_cpu_power_state(int cpu);
>
> Hmm...is it really 'cpu' related? Or 'core' related? As I know, when the
> function is called, ARM core and L1 cache will be power_up/down except L2
> cache...But I have no strong objection to use 'cpu' here
OK, I am keeping cpu as it is then.
>
>>
>> #endif /* __ARCH_ARM_MACH_EXYNOS_COMMON_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> index 15af0ce..6651028 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/pm.c
>> @@ -100,6 +100,42 @@ static int exynos_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data,
>> unsigned int state)
>> return -ENOENT;
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * exynos_cpu_powerdown : power down the specified cpu
>> + * @cpu : the cpu to power down
>> + *
>> + * Power downs the specified cpu. The sequence must be finished by a
>> + * call to cpu_do_idle()
>> + *
>> + */
>> +void exynos_cpu_powerdown(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + __raw_writel(0, EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpu));
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * exynos_cpu_powerup : power up the specified cpu
>> + * @cpu : the cpu to power up
>> + *
>> + * Power up the specified cpu
>> + */
>> +void exynos_cpu_powerup(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + __raw_writel(S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN,
>> + EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(cpu));
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * exynos_cpu_power_state : returns the power state of the cpu
>> + * @cpu : the cpu to retrieve the power state from
>> + *
>> + */
>> +int exynos_cpu_power_state(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return (__raw_readl(EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(cpu)) &
>> + S5P_CORE_LOCAL_PWR_EN);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* For Cortex-A9 Diagnostic and Power control register */
>> static unsigned int save_arm_register[2];
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-
>> pmu.h
>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h
>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@
>>
>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD
>>
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000)
>
> This can be put in order of address.
OK, will fix.
>
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \
>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr)))
>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \
>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4)
>
> Can you please cleanup codes following definitions are used with using above
> definitions?
>
> S5P_ARM_CORE1_CONFIGURATION and S5P_ARM_CORE1_STATUS in hotplug.c and
> platsmp.c
Will remove these.
Regards,
Abhilash
>
>> +
>> /* Only for EXYNOS4210 */
>> #define S5P_CMU_CLKSTOP_LCD1_LOWPWR S5P_PMUREG(0x1154)
>> #define S5P_CMU_RESET_LCD1_LOWPWR S5P_PMUREG(0x1174)
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-05 16:26 [PATCH v5 0/5] MCPM backend for Exynos5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-05 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] arm: exynos: Add generic cluster power control functions Abhilash Kesavan
[not found] ` <1399307221-8659-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-05-05 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add generic cpu power control functions for all exynos based SoCs Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 2:24 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-13 10:12 ` Abhilash Kesavan [this message]
2014-05-15 21:11 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-16 5:07 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-17 0:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-05-19 2:42 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-05 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] ARM: EXYNOS: use generic exynos cpu power control functions Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-13 2:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-13 10:13 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-05 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: dts: exynos5420: add CCI node Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-05 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] arm: exynos: Add MCPM call-back functions Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-05 18:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-05-27 11:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-27 11:39 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-05-27 14:25 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-05-27 15:17 ` Kukjin Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM4voamSNYZ_hsjF3eZhqZ=FF__39tFgi5FeXRcUhRbYYzu0LQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
--cc=jhbird.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=skon.hwang@samsung.com \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).