From: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: dwc: rockchip: add legacy interrupt support
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:07:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYoBUMaipHK_ymwhx_y70N0MUN5noDvUFcf3mK5ngM0SmA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c493261cef27714181a523545dab6d0e@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 4:36 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-04-13 14:37, Peter Geis wrote:
> > The legacy interrupts on the rk356x pcie controller are handled by a
> > single muxed interrupt. Add irq domain support to the pcie-dw-rockchip
> > driver to support the virtual domain.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c | 123 +++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 121 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > index c9b341e55cbb..a8b1dc03d3cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c
> > @@ -10,9 +10,12 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/clk.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqchip/chained_irq.h>
> > +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> > #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/regmap.h>
> > @@ -36,10 +39,13 @@
> > #define PCIE_LINKUP (PCIE_SMLH_LINKUP | PCIE_RDLH_LINKUP)
> > #define PCIE_L0S_ENTRY 0x11
> > #define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_CONTROL 0x0
> > +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY 0x8
> > +#define PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY 0x1c
> > #define PCIE_CLIENT_GENERAL_DEBUG 0x104
> > -#define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180
> > +#define PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL 0x180
> > #define PCIE_CLIENT_LTSSM_STATUS 0x300
> > -#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
> > +#define PCIE_LEGACY_INT_ENABLE GENMASK(3, 0)
> > +#define PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE BIT(4)
> > #define PCIE_LTSSM_STATUS_MASK GENMASK(5, 0)
> >
> > struct rockchip_pcie {
> > @@ -51,6 +57,8 @@ struct rockchip_pcie {
> > struct reset_control *rst;
> > struct gpio_desc *rst_gpio;
> > struct regulator *vpcie3v3;
> > + struct irq_domain *irq_domain;
> > + raw_spinlock_t irq_lock;
> > };
> >
> > static int rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> > @@ -65,6 +73,105 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(struct
> > rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
> > writel_relaxed(val, rockchip->apb_base + reg);
> > }
> >
> > +static void rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> > + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> > + u32 reg;
> > + u32 hwirq;
> > + u32 virq;
> > +
> > + chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > +
> > + reg = rockchip_pcie_readl_apb(rockchip,
> > PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_STATUS_LEGACY);
> > +
> > + while (reg) {
> > + hwirq = ffs(reg) - 1;
> > + reg &= ~BIT(hwirq);
>
> The whole construct would be better served by for_each_set_bit().
Ah, that's much nicer, thanks!
>
> > +
> > + virq = irq_find_mapping(rockchip->irq_domain, hwirq);
> > + if (virq)
> > + generic_handle_irq(virq);
>
> Please replace this with generic_handle_domain_irq().
I see the bulk conversion was done after I created this patch.
I will make this change.
>
> > + else
> > + dev_err(dev, "unexpected IRQ, INT%d\n", hwirq);
>
> This hardly serves any purpose. At best, this is a debug statement.
> At worse, this is a DoS. In any case, please remove it.
Done!
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void rockchip_intx_mask(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /* disable legacy interrupts */
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rockchip->irq_lock, flags);
> > + val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LEGACY_INT_ENABLE);
> > + val |= PCIE_LEGACY_INT_ENABLE;
> > + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val,
> > PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rockchip->irq_lock, flags);
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void rockchip_intx_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
> > +{
> > + struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + u32 val;
> > +
> > + /* enable legacy interrupts */
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rockchip->irq_lock, flags);
> > + val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LEGACY_INT_ENABLE);
> > + val &= ~PCIE_LEGACY_INT_ENABLE;
> > + rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val,
> > PCIE_CLIENT_INTR_MASK_LEGACY);
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rockchip->irq_lock, flags);
> > +};
> > +
> > +static struct irq_chip rockchip_intx_irq_chip = {
> > + .flags = IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND,
> > + .irq_mask = rockchip_intx_mask,
> > + .irq_unmask = rockchip_intx_unmask,
> > + .name = "INTx",
>
> For consistency, please place 'name' at the top, and 'flags' at the end.
Will do.
>
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_pcie_intx_map(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned
> > int irq,
> > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> > +{
> > + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &rockchip_intx_irq_chip,
> > handle_simple_irq);
>
> Why isn't this a *level* handler, as per the PCI spec?
Fixed.
>
> > + irq_set_chip_data(irq, domain->host_data);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct irq_domain_ops intx_domain_ops = {
> > + .map = rockchip_pcie_intx_map,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct rockchip_pcie
> > *rockchip)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> > + struct device_node *intc;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_init(&rockchip->irq_lock);
> > +
> > + intc = of_get_child_by_name(dev->of_node,
> > "legacy-interrupt-controller");
> > + if (!intc) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "missing child interrupt-controller node\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rockchip->irq_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(intc, PCI_NUM_INTX,
> > + &intx_domain_ops, rockchip);
> > + of_node_put(intc);
> > + if (!rockchip->irq_domain) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to get a INTx IRQ domain\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void rockchip_pcie_enable_ltssm(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> > {
> > rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_ENABLE_LTSSM,
> > @@ -111,7 +218,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_host_init(struct
> > pcie_port *pp)
> > {
> > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip = to_rockchip_pcie(pci);
> > + struct device *dev = rockchip->pci.dev;
> > u32 val = HIWORD_UPDATE_BIT(PCIE_LTSSM_ENABLE_ENHANCE);
> > + int irq, ret;
> > +
> > + irq = of_irq_get_byname(dev->of_node, "legacy");
> > + if (irq < 0)
> > + return irq;
> > +
> > + irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(irq,
> > rockchip_pcie_legacy_int_handler, rockchip);
> > +
>
> Installing the handler before the domain is instantiated is
> unlikely to end well if you have a pending interrupt...
While the interrupts are masked at this stage, you make a valid point,
I'll move this a little south.
>
> > + ret = rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain(rockchip);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + dev_err(dev, "failed to init irq domain\n");
> >
> > /* LTSSM enable control mode */
> > rockchip_pcie_writel_apb(rockchip, val, PCIE_CLIENT_HOT_RESET_CTRL);
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Thank you for your review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-15 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 13:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] Enable rk356x PCIe controller Peter Geis
2022-04-13 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: pci: remove fallback from Rockchip DesignWare binding Peter Geis
2022-04-14 17:53 ` Rob Herring
2022-04-15 20:14 ` Peter Geis
2022-04-13 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] PCI: dwc: rockchip: add legacy interrupt support Peter Geis
2022-04-14 20:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-04-15 20:07 ` Peter Geis [this message]
2022-04-13 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: add rk3568 pcie2x1 controller Peter Geis
2022-04-13 13:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: enable pcie controller on quartz64-a Peter Geis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMdYzYoBUMaipHK_ymwhx_y70N0MUN5noDvUFcf3mK5ngM0SmA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pgwipeout@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).