From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C714C433B4 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9DD613C0 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 08:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229938AbhDVIKx (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:10:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37088 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229655AbhDVIKw (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 04:10:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B989AC06138B for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:10:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id w23so51628046ejb.9 for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:10:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amarulasolutions.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=h+CMl0wy3Vjr3C3/bC9rZ5K1PCcuzB8i4uU1sLoEz/Q=; b=REWRFzLC60dlqnMXMPEWx38bd5GYmNw56uXhyWHcnMYr3Tv5NpMHovQnA5Bb+5InmN 4b+4f0c1dH/bJ06BBd0tlLT9CpiaeANYTqzerfaaKs42oIiIp1kXhG4vlCosi3/d5fu2 ElHUSdzzB0d8IjpqH4NOgi+LZkCL7w/YXTu+o= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=h+CMl0wy3Vjr3C3/bC9rZ5K1PCcuzB8i4uU1sLoEz/Q=; b=qLJ+EkiKzy4QqLu97pjHFpzIA8J7u1K4ptVLAm7Z7SGjcb/ARp7VkkodMGCBfHZttb iuFuydb1ujI5FIIZNZsdH6slfmTsyCuUfNmRffgLss0kb8GTT//3hKdJY1bjmN4LU7en CKugfODWyFi5XsHHwgOf7BlDI9sbjgwD1lYx+2gK1wekWNpFLa8xOJnHtJKuhR+MvH+X 0HhSx15RSdQq3YCNV4QduAA/KSg8vXYJzgOI22UtAsvkty8g/CPMJR5bxLRtCDaFOV0Q d0Y0oDwGsy1gsPa/HNmhnJ+N4DmBvf+yDXjKZZ9o3YfW9XCmUWzAuNutAejfly/fkBsr xJQw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TZw4Km+Nmz4mIZSe9hinvsxoSplsqw46V/3YleX1koW358/qt roU/8yRDJ+EMab1tte64r8ZfIbDSpiHoWGMoff2NOA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz86iG8pbA8A6dOaF9RURCM9V6vojTjv4f6LyDRLnUH+5yxZV2UZ3/KAwNZFRV4cxKgrwj0Yfx3i4LiRRYoxeY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:235b:: with SMTP id m27mr2083664eja.336.1619079016529; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 01:10:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210214174453.104616-1-jagan@amarulasolutions.com> <2d9a88e9-e443-0243-4b68-85fc01d9677b@denx.de> In-Reply-To: <2d9a88e9-e443-0243-4b68-85fc01d9677b@denx.de> From: Jagan Teki Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:40:05 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add bindings for SN65DSI83/84/85 To: Marek Vasut Cc: Claudius Heine , Rob Herring , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Sam Ravnborg , devicetree , linux-kernel , dri-devel , linux-amarula Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:04 AM Marek Vasut wrote: > > On 4/8/21 4:45 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 7:26 PM Claudius Heine wrote: > >> > >> Hi Jagan, > >> > >> On 2021-02-14 18:44, Jagan Teki wrote: > >>> SN65DSI83/84/85 devices are MIPI DSI to LVDS based bridge > >>> controller IC's from Texas Instruments. > >>> > >>> SN65DSI83 - Single Channel DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge > >>> SN65DSI84 - Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge > >>> SN65DSI85 - Dual Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge > >>> > >>> Right now the bridge driver is supporting Channel A with single > >>> link, so dt-bindings documented according to it. > >> > >> Do you know when we can expect a v4 for this? > >> > >> I am currently working on top of your patch set to setup a dual-link > >> LVDS bridge of SN65DSI84. > > > > Yes, I'm planning to send v4 this week. will keep you in CC. thanks! > > I haven't seen any activity here for over two weeks, so I decided to > send V2 of the driver I wrote, now tested on both DSI83 and DSI84. It delayed me since I have considered several comments from the Mailing list to wrote Dual Link-LVDS configuration support. I have a plan to send v4 in the coming weekend with these changes, I thought it would be the possible driver to support 1 and 2 links LVDS. Jagan.