From: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
To: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Link DSI panel at port@1 for TM2 board
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 15:03:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZDF8jjoOx_qHsFAVKGDPqrOaiwSFkCikrHZQLRd-OV0pQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9912c743-8acb-c59a-760a-a9b79ed48784@intel.com>
Hi Andrzej,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:05 PM Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> wrote:
>
> +CC: dri-devel
>
> On 10.01.2022 16:27, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > TM2 board DSI pipeline has input from MIC and output to
> > s6e3ha2 panel.
> >
> > The existing pipeline has child nodes of ports, panel and
> > MIC is remote-endpoint reference of port@0 of ports.
> >
> > Adding panel as another child node to DSI is unconventional
> > as pipeline has ports child. However it can be true if MIC
> > is added inside port node like this.
> >
> > dsi {
> > compatible = "samsung,exynos5433-mipi-dsi";
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > port {
> > dsi_to_mic: endpoint {
> > remote-endpoint = <&mic_to_dsi>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > panel@0 {
> > compatible = "samsung,s6e3hf2";
> > reg = <0>;
> > vdd3-supply = <&ldo27_reg>;
> > vci-supply = <&ldo28_reg>;
> > reset-gpios = <&gpg0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > enable-gpios = <&gpf1 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > };
> > };
> >
> > The above pipeline is proper but it requires the DSI input MIC
> > pipeline to update.
> >
> > This patch is trying to add panel at port@1 so-that the entire
> > pipeline before to panel output is untouched.
> >
> > Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts
> > index aca01709fd29..e13210c8d7e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433-tm2.dts
> > @@ -53,6 +53,16 @@ &cmu_disp {
> > };
> >
> > &dsi {
> > + ports {
> > + port@1 {
> > + reg = <1>;
> > +
> > + dsi_out_panel: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&dsi_in_panel>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > panel@0 {
> > compatible = "samsung,s6e3ha2";
> > reg = <0>;
> > @@ -60,6 +70,12 @@ panel@0 {
> > vci-supply = <&ldo28_reg>;
> > reset-gpios = <&gpg0 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> > enable-gpios = <&gpf1 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > +
> > + port {
> > + dsi_in_panel: endpoint {
> > + remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out_panel>;
> > + };
> > + };
>
>
> As I already wrote in Exynos thread, DSI host has already parent-child
> relation with the panel - DSI host knows well who is connected to it.
> Adding another links between them is redundant and has no value added.
>
> I have already answered in Exynos thread[1] how could you deal with the
> issue, you have.
>
> [1]:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/e541c52b-9751-933b-5eac-783dd0ed9056@intel.com/
I have commented on this thread for better understanding. Please have
a look and respond.
Thanks,
Jagan.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 15:27 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Link DSI panel at port@1 for TM2 board Jagan Teki
2022-01-10 15:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Link DSI panel at port@1 for TM2E board Jagan Teki
2022-01-11 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: exynos: Link DSI panel at port@1 for TM2 board Andrzej Hajda
2022-01-11 9:33 ` Jagan Teki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMty3ZDF8jjoOx_qHsFAVKGDPqrOaiwSFkCikrHZQLRd-OV0pQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jagan@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-amarula@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).