From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@k>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers
Date: Wed, 2 May 2018 23:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU7b86fWAFaK6LQ0gHukJebc4fegUetHPCvu7ujdjSfRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a0tMp2QURp-9WuHehqE0b6-BO1wJ38siTdxhxgwCb-ERw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>> 2018-04-27 12:18 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 10:57 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski
>>> <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>>> 2018-04-27 9:52 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 4:28 AM, David Lechner <david@lechnology.com> wrote:
>>>> My patch tries to address exactly the use cases we're facing - for
>>>> example by providing means to probe devices twice (early and late) and
>>>> to check the state we're at in order for users to be able to just do
>>>> the critical initialization early on and then continue with regular
>>>> stuff later.
>>>
>>> Maybe the problem is reusing the name and some of the code from
>>> an existing functionality that we've been trying to get rid of.
>>>
>>
>> I'm not reusing the name - in fact I set the prefix to earlydev_
>> exactly in order to not confuse anyone. I'm also not reusing any code
>> in the second series.
>
> Ok.
>
>>> If what you want to do is completely different from the existing
>>> early_platform implementation, how about starting by moving that
>>> out of drivers/base/platform.c into something under arch/sh/
>>> and renaming it to something with an sh_ prefix.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, this is a good idea, but what about the sh-specific drivers that
>> rely on it? Is including headers from arch/ in driver code still an
>> accepted practice?
>
> I think it's fine here, since we're just move it out of the way and
> there are only very few drivers using it:
>
> drivers/clocksource/sh_cmt.c:early_platform_init("earlytimer",
> &sh_cmt_device_driver);
> drivers/clocksource/sh_mtu2.c:early_platform_init("earlytimer",
> &sh_mtu2_device_driver);
> drivers/clocksource/sh_tmu.c:early_platform_init("earlytimer",
> &sh_tmu_device_driver);
> drivers/clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c:early_platform_init("earlytimer",
> &omap_dm_timer_driver);
> drivers/tty/serial/sh-sci.c:early_platform_init_buffer("earlyprintk",
> &sci_driver,
>
> For timer-ti-dm, it seems like a leftover from old times that can
> be removed. The other four are shared between arch/sh and
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile and already have some #ifdef
> to handle those two cases.
Sh-sci is also used on arm64, for R-Car Gen3 SoCs.
While the latter has CMT and TMU hardware blocks, so far we haven't enabled
support for it yet (just using the ARM arch timer is too convenient? ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-02 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 15:29 [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-26 15:29 ` [PATCH RFC PoC 1/2] earlydev: implement a new way to probe platform devices early Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 15:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-26 15:29 ` [PATCH RFC PoC 2/2] misc: implement a dummy early platform driver Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-26 17:31 ` [PATCH RFC PoC 0/2] platform: different approach to early platform drivers Rich Felker
2018-04-27 2:28 ` David Lechner
2018-04-27 2:54 ` Rich Felker
2018-04-27 7:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 8:29 ` Sekhar Nori
2018-04-27 8:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 8:59 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 8:57 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 10:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 11:53 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 12:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 14:05 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 14:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 16:05 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2018-04-27 19:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-04-27 15:22 ` Rich Felker
2018-05-02 21:11 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdU7b86fWAFaK6LQ0gHukJebc4fegUetHPCvu7ujdjSfRw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=david@lechnology.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=robh+dt@k \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).