From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Cc: magnus.damm@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add suspend/resume support
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 16:06:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUG595o8u1kgqW6DxfvBuzKuOPv7XkJhg_GQmnbRui8Tw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208135629.2840932-2-claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Hi Claudiu,
On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 6:59 PM Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev> wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
>
> pinctrl-rzg2l driver is used on RZ/G3S which support deep sleep states
> where power to most of the SoC components is turned off.
>
> For this add suspend/resume support. This involves saving and restoring
> configured registers along with disabling clock in case there is no pin
> configured as wakeup sources.
>
> To save/restore registers 2 caches were allocated: one for GPIO pins and
> one for dedicated pins.
>
> On suspend path the pin controller registers are saved and if none of the
> pins are configured as wakeup sources the pinctrl clock is disabled.
> Otherwise it remains on.
>
> On resume path the configuration is done as follows:
> 1/ setup PFCs by writing to registers on pin based accesses
> 2/ setup GPIOs by writing to registers on port based accesses and
> following configuration steps specified in hardware manual
> 3/ setup dedicated pins by writing to registers on port based accesses
> 4/ setup interrupts.
>
> Because interrupt signals are routed to IA55 interrupt controller and
> IA55 interrupt controller resumes before pin controller, patch restores
> also the configured interrupts just after pin settings are restored to
> avoid invalid interrupts while resuming.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>
Thanks for your patch!
In my review below, I am focussing on the wake-up part, as that is
usually the hardest part to get right.
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c
> @@ -260,6 +315,9 @@ struct rzg2l_pinctrl {
> struct mutex mutex; /* serialize adding groups and functions */
>
> struct rzg2l_pinctrl_pin_settings *settings;
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl_reg_cache *cache;
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl_reg_cache *dedicated_cache;
> + atomic_t wakeup_source;
I'd call this wakeup_path, as the wake-up source is the ultimate device
that triggers the GPIO.
> };
>
> static const u16 available_ps[] = { 1800, 2500, 3300 };
> @@ -1880,6 +1938,19 @@ static void rzg2l_gpio_irq_print_chip(struct irq_data *data, struct seq_file *p)
> seq_printf(p, dev_name(gc->parent));
> }
>
> +static int rzg2l_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *data, unsigned int on)
> +{
> + struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl = container_of(gc, struct rzg2l_pinctrl, gpio_chip);
> +
I think you also have to call irq_set_irq_wake(pctrl->hwirq[...]) here.
Cfr. drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c (which is simpler, as it has a single interrupt
parent, instead of a parent irq_domain with multiple interrupts).
> + if (on)
> + atomic_inc(&pctrl->wakeup_source);
> + else
> + atomic_dec(&pctrl->wakeup_source);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct irq_chip rzg2l_gpio_irqchip = {
> .name = "rzg2l-gpio",
> .irq_disable = rzg2l_gpio_irq_disable,
> +static int rzg2l_pinctrl_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + const struct rzg2l_hwcfg *hwcfg = pctrl->data->hwcfg;
> + const struct rzg2l_register_offsets *regs = &hwcfg->regs;
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl_reg_cache *cache = pctrl->cache;
> +
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_regs(pctrl, true);
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_dedicated_regs(pctrl, true);
> +
> + for (u8 i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + cache->sd_ch[i] = readl(pctrl->base + SD_CH(regs->sd_ch, i));
> + cache->eth_poc[i] = readl(pctrl->base + ETH_POC(regs->eth_poc, i));
> + }
> +
> + cache->qspi = readl(pctrl->base + QSPI);
> + cache->eth_mode = readl(pctrl->base + ETH_MODE);
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(&pctrl->wakeup_source))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pctrl->clk);
While you handle the module clock yourself, I think there is still merit
in calling device_set_wakeup_path(dev) when the clock is kept enabled.
BTW, is there any need to save the registers when pinctrl is part of
the wake-up path, and its module clock is not disabled?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int rzg2l_pinctrl_resume_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + const struct rzg2l_hwcfg *hwcfg = pctrl->data->hwcfg;
> + const struct rzg2l_register_offsets *regs = &hwcfg->regs;
> + struct rzg2l_pinctrl_reg_cache *cache = pctrl->cache;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!atomic_read(&pctrl->wakeup_source)) {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pctrl->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
Is there any need to restore the registers when pinctrl is part of
the wake-up path, and its module clock was not disabled?
> +
> + writel(cache->qspi, pctrl->base + QSPI);
> + writel(cache->eth_mode, pctrl->base + ETH_MODE);
> + for (u8 i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + writel(cache->sd_ch[i], pctrl->base + SD_CH(regs->sd_ch, i));
> + writel(cache->eth_poc[i], pctrl->base + ETH_POC(regs->eth_poc, i));
> + }
> +
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_pfc(pctrl);
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_regs(pctrl, false);
> + rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_dedicated_regs(pctrl, false);
> + rzg2l_gpio_irq_restore(pctrl);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-12 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-08 13:56 [PATCH 0/2] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add suspend to RAM support Claudiu
2024-02-08 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: renesas: rzg2l: Add suspend/resume support Claudiu
2024-02-09 5:54 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-12 15:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2024-02-12 15:35 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-15 9:14 ` claudiu beznea
2024-02-15 9:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-02-08 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g045: add PSCI support Claudiu
2024-02-12 14:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdUG595o8u1kgqW6DxfvBuzKuOPv7XkJhg_GQmnbRui8Tw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).