From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/27] C-SKY(csky) Linux Kernel Port Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:21:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20180914143719.GA27689@guoren-Inspiron-7460> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Guo Ren , Linux-Arch , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , Jason Cooper , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com, Peter Zijlstra , c-sky_gcc_upstream@c-sky.com, gnu-csky@mentor.com, Thomas Petazzoni , wbx@uclibc-ng.org, Greentime Hu , Stephen Rothwell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 7:19 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:52 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 07:37:20 PDT (-0700), ren_guo@c-sky.com wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 04:30:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 3:25 PM Guo Ren wrote: > My plan was to get that all into 4.20, and then have a conversation about the > actual syscall table changes in 4.21. If we need it for both csky and rv32, > we might just change the generic syscall table that way in 4.21 without > changing all the other ones along with them. I don't want to drag things out > over too many merge windows though, and my plan was to do all architectures > together to simplify the version checks in the libc code to only have to check > for a single version. What happens with the version checks if it is backported to stable? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds