devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dtx_diff - add color output support
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 10:44:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdW5XmG-320uhAsqxC-oCq7POtZKOOE1V485nB5K1vzh8g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88417bc8-3cd8-bb54-e487-8fa6b0b1f346@gmail.com>

Hi Frank,

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 9:55 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/1/19 5:13 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 10:30 PM Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 7/31/19 5:37 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>> Add new -c/--color options, to enhance the diff output with color, and
> >>> improve the user's experience.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> >>> ---
> >>>  scripts/dtc/dtx_diff | 10 +++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/scripts/dtc/dtx_diff b/scripts/dtc/dtx_diff
> >>> index e9ad7834a22d9459..4e2c8617f69a333e 100755
> >>> --- a/scripts/dtc/dtx_diff
> >>> +++ b/scripts/dtc/dtx_diff
> >>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Usage:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>        --annotate    synonym for -T
> >>> +      --color       synonym for -c
> >>> +       -c           enable colored output
> >>>         -f           print full dts in diff (--unified=99999)
> >>>         -h           synonym for --help
> >>>         -help        synonym for --help
> >
> >> I like the idea, but...
> >>
> >> I have various linux distro releases across my many systems, but only one is
> >> new enough to have the diff command that supports --color.
> >
> > Seems to have been added in diffutils release 3.4 (2016-08-08).
> > I almost can't believe it was that recent, but then I remembered using a
> > wrapper before (colordiff; other wrappers may exist).
> >
> >> Can you enhance this patch to test whether --color is supported?  Maybe
> >> something like (untested):
> >>
> >>         -c | --color )
> >>                 if `diff --color <(echo a) <(echo a) 2>/dev/null` ; then
> >>                         diff_color="--color=always"
> >>                 fi
> >>                 shift
> >>                 ;;
> >>
> >> Then add some text to the usage for -c and --color saying that they will
> >> be silently ignored if diff does not support --color.
> >>
> >> I first wrote up a suggested version that printed an error message and
> >> exited, but I think silently ignoring is more robust, even though it
> >> may be more confusing to someone who is wondering why --color does not
> >> work.
> >
> > Given this is an optional feature, to be enabled explicitly by the user,
> > I'm not so fond of going through hoops to auto-detect the availability.
> >
> > So what about just documenting this in the help text instead?
> >
> > -      -c           enable colored output
> > +      -c           enable colored output (requires diff with --color support)
>
> -----  thought 1  -----
>
> My first thought was:
>
> If the hoops were complex and ugly, I might agree with you.  But since it is
> a simple one line "if" (two lines including "fi") I prefer the check.
>
> The help text update looks good to me, along with the check.

OK.

> -----  thought 2  -----
>
> Then I reconsidered, and thought "well, Geert has a good idea".  So I
> decided to see how useful the diff error message would be.  The message is:
>
>    $ scripts/dtc/dtx_diff -c a.dts b.dts
>    diff: unrecognized option '--color=always'
>    diff: Try 'diff --help' for more information.
>    $
>    Possible hints to resolve the above error:
>      (hints might not fix the problem)
>
>      No hints available.
>
> It is interesting that the shell prompt arrives before the full set of
> messages from the script, but that is not my issue.  My issue is that

That is due to the output coming from the two "<(compile_to_dts ...)"
sub-processes, not from the diff sub-process.

> when the diff fails, the script tries to find suggestions to solve
> the problem.  (The suggestions exist to catch some likely problems
> with the shell variable "ARCH".)

Interesting. I didn't know about the hints (never saw them), and had to
try hard to trigger them (I usually do DTB comparisons only).
But I succeeded ;-)
With a small tweak as my diff does support --color:

    $ scripts/dtc/dtx_diff -c
arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7799*{ebisu,draak}.dts
    diff: unrecognized option '--olor=always'
    diff: Try 'diff --help' for more information.
    $
    Possible hints to resolve the above error:
      (hints might not fix the problem)

      shell variable $ARCH not set

      architecture arm64 is in file path,
      but does not match shell variable $ARCH
      >>$ARCH<< is: >><<


    Possible hints to resolve the above error:
      (hints might not fix the problem)

      shell variable $ARCH not set

      architecture arm64 is in file path,
      but does not match shell variable $ARCH
      >>$ARCH<< is: >><<

> Unfortunately in the case of the "--color" problem, the useful warning
> from diff becomes less visible because of the early prompt and the
> not so helpful messages about hints.

Yeah, they are not so helpful.
In fact $ARCH is indeed not set, but that's not an issue at all.

> If the hints related messages were not present, then I was ready to
> accept that the diff warning was sufficient.  But since the hints
> messages are present, and hiding them would be more complex than
> the original check that I suggested for whether diff supports
> the --color option, I am back to my first thought: I prefer the
> check whether diff supports "--color" is done when dtx_diff detects
> the "--color" option.

OK, you managed to convince me. Will fix.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-02  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-31 12:37 [PATCH] scripts/dtc: dtx_diff - add color output support Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-07-31 20:30 ` Frank Rowand
2019-08-01 12:13   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-01 19:55     ` Frank Rowand
2019-08-02  8:44       ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2019-08-02 14:45         ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdW5XmG-320uhAsqxC-oCq7POtZKOOE1V485nB5K1vzh8g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).