From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] ARM: shmobile: r8a7743: basic SoC support Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:11:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2056698.ncAHq8vRQ3@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <15557770.lH5aPepOeZ@wasted.cogentembedded.com> <20161007031537.GK13721@verge.net.au> <2345971.ESZSzve5jF@avalon> <836d9018-e8f4-27ef-bfff-06932184d59f@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <836d9018-e8f4-27ef-bfff-06932184d59f@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-renesas-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Laurent Pinchart , Simon Horman , Linux-Renesas , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Magnus Damm , Russell King , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Sergei, On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > On 10/7/2016 11:33 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> Add minimal support for the RZ/G1M (R8A7743) SoC. >>>> Based on the original (and large) patch by Dmitry Shifrin >>>> . >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov >>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven >>> >>> >>> Thanks, I have queued this up. >> >> >> I'd like to see this patch rebased on top of "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile: >> Consolidate R8A779[234] machine definitions". > > > R87743 is analogous to R8A7791, not R8A779[234], not sure how it is > connected to your patch. The comment + /* + * R8A7790 and R8A7791 can't be handled here as long as they need SMP + * initialization fallback. + */ is not about r8a7790/r8a7791 in se, but about backward compatibility support for DTBs without APMU nodes and CPU enable-methods. For new SoCs, we mandate the presence of these in the DTB. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds