devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] of: platform: Make sure bus only devices get probed
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 21:06:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWNP1yn0ouJzgYpvQkdAHAA4_gf8z+iZWpbftvGN5a+qQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx9W6FYCD62+QytwK5FThpz0EyKn0G6Ay2B5jKgiqkZT1g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Saravana,

On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 7:09 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 7:29 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:19 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Sept 2021 at 01:04, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > > > fw_devlink could end up creating device links for bus only devices.
> > > > However, bus only devices don't get probed and can block probe() or
> > > > sync_state() [1] call backs of other devices. To avoid this, set up
> > > > these devices to get probed by the simple-pm-bus.
> > > >
> > > > [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPDyKFo9Bxremkb1dDrr4OcXSpE0keVze94Cm=zrkOVxHHxBmQ@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > > > Tested-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> > >
> > > Again, this looks like a nice solution to the problem.
> > >
> > > One question though. The Kconfig SIMPLE_PM_BUS, should probably be
> > > "default y" - or something along those lines to make sure fw_devlink
> > > works as expected.
> >
> > I would love for SIMPLE_PM_BUS to go away, and all of its functionality
> > to be usurped by the standard simple-bus handling.
>
> What if SIMPLE_PM_BUS *is* the standard simple-bus handling?
> Insert "I'm the captain now" meme.

No objections from my side.  In fact that's how I wanted it to be
from the beginning, but the DT people wanted a separate compatible
value (and a separate driver).  The only difference is the presence
of pm_runtime_*() calls.

> I think SIMPLE_PM_BUS config should just go away and we should compile
> the driver in if CONFIG_OF is selected.

I think there would be no need for a separate driver, if the standard
simple-bus handling would take care of it.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-03 19:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-02 23:04 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix simple-bus issues with fw_devlink Saravana Kannan
2021-09-02 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] of: platform: Make sure bus only devices get probed Saravana Kannan
2021-09-03  9:18   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-09-03 14:29     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-03 17:09       ` Saravana Kannan
2021-09-03 19:06         ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2021-09-03 19:08           ` Saravana Kannan
2021-09-07 10:35       ` Ulf Hansson
2021-09-07 10:52         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-07 11:02           ` Ulf Hansson
2021-09-02 23:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: bus: simple-pm-bus: Add support for probing simple bus only devices Saravana Kannan
2021-09-03  9:14   ` Ulf Hansson
2021-09-03 17:10     ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdWNP1yn0ouJzgYpvQkdAHAA4_gf8z+iZWpbftvGN5a+qQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).