From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] regulator: bd9571mwv: Add support for DDR backup mode Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:11:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1524057484-25350-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20180420074914.vl4rer5zdeldfzb3@dell> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180420074914.vl4rer5zdeldfzb3@dell> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Marek Vasut , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Linux-Renesas , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Lee, On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> The ROHM BD9571MWV PMIC on the Renesas Salvator-X(S) and ULCB >> development boards supports DDR Backup Power, which means that the DDR >> power rails can be kept powered while the main SoC is powered down. > > Should this set be applied together, or can the MFD patches be applied > on their own, without the Regulator patch? The regulator patch depends on the MFD patches, so it's best for them to go in together. > If the former, then we're going to need an Ack from Mark. Alternative, as you've already supplied (some form of) your Ack for the firs 3 patches, they can go in through Mark? All of it is enhancing the regulator part. I don't care much which path the patches take, though. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds