From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Gaurav Minocha
<gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Add missing of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path()
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 21:35:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXcroty+HJ4wiE-s849hiHi5Ct_XnfinGC0U+Az1u90vg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150122161446.101EBC40A80-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:45:56 +0100
> , Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> wrote:
>> When traversing all nodes and moving to a new path component, the old
>> one must be released by calling of_node_put(). Else the refcounts of the
>> parent node(s) will not be decremented.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Background.
>>
>> While investigating a reference count imbalance issue with
>> CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC=y, I wrote the debug code below to validate the
>> reference counts of the nodes I was interested in.
>> During the first call of check_refcnts(), it gathers all reference
>> counts. During a subsequent call, it verifies that they are still the
>> same.
>>
>> Surprisingly, lots of reference counts were wrong, and kept incrementing
>> every time check_refcnts() was called.
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index 36536b6a8834acd2..f3e346e19c69d1f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -791,8 +791,10 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_opts_by_path(const char *path, const char **opt
>> if (!np)
>> np = of_node_get(of_root);
>> while (np && *path == '/') {
>> + struct device_node *parent = np;
>> path++; /* Increment past '/' delimiter */
>> - np = __of_find_node_by_path(np, path);
>> + np = __of_find_node_by_path(parent, path);
>> + of_node_put(parent);
>> path = strchrnul(path, '/');
>> }
>> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
>
> This doesn't look /quite/ the best. __for_each_child_of_node() is
> fiddling with refcounts, but the '__' of functions shouldn't need to do
> that since they are called under the spinlock (nothing is going to
> change while they are called). __of_find_all_nodes() for instance
> doesn't do refcounting, but of_find_all_nodes() does.
>
> Does the following also solve the problem?
Yes, it does.
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 36536b6a8834..0357b51a7440 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -626,9 +626,8 @@ static struct device_node *__of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>
> next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
> for (; next; next = next->sibling)
> - if (of_node_get(next))
> + if (next)
> break;
> - of_node_put(prev);
> return next;
> }
> #define __for_each_child_of_node(parent, child) \
> @@ -650,7 +649,8 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
> unsigned long flags;
>
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
> - next = __of_get_next_child(node, prev);
> + next = of_node_get(__of_get_next_child(node, prev));
> + of_node_put(prev);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
> return next;
> }
> @@ -789,12 +789,13 @@ struct device_node *of_find_node_opts_by_path(const char *path, const char **opt
> /* Step down the tree matching path components */
> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
> if (!np)
> - np = of_node_get(of_root);
> + np = of_root;
> while (np && *path == '/') {
> path++; /* Increment past '/' delimiter */
> np = __of_find_node_by_path(np, path);
> path = strchrnul(path, '/');
> }
> + of_node_get(np);
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&devtree_lock, flags);
> return np;
> }
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-22 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 15:45 [PATCH] of: Add missing of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path() Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <1421250356-16690-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 16:14 ` Grant Likely
2015-01-22 16:18 ` Grant Likely
[not found] ` <CACxGe6sDFQQfiN0+d5HV7JPE-0bosqdaKqrS-7o-obCy1NP_qg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 20:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <20150122161446.101EBC40A80-WNowdnHR2B42iJbIjFUEsiwD8/FfD2ys@public.gmane.org>
2015-01-22 20:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdXcroty+HJ4wiE-s849hiHi5Ct_XnfinGC0U+Az1u90vg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert-td1emuhucqxl1znqvxdv9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gaurav.minocha.os-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).