From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Norris Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] mtd: nand: omap: updated devm_xx for all resource allocation and free calls Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:14:43 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1381498603-15715-1-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <1381498603-15715-7-git-send-email-pekon@ti.com> <20131011181515.GJ23337@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> <20131011182840.GW29913@atomide.com> <20131011214653.GA29913@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131011214653.GA29913@atomide.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Pekon Gupta , Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , "olof@lixom.net" , Artem Bityutskiy , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Stephen Warren , David Woodhouse , Arnd Bergmann , Benoit Cousson , Avinash Philip , "Balbi, Felipe" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Brian Norris [131011 12:35]: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> > >> > FYI, the .dts changes should be queued separately by Benoit to avoid >> > pointless merge conflicts. The arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c changes I >> > need to look, hopefully I can ack those for you today so you can take >> > the code related changes into the MTD tree. >> >> Why are you replying to this patch, instead of the DTS? > > Because you said you might merrge some parts of the series and I've > seen many merge cycles of pointless merge conflicts with driver > maintainers merging .dts files along with the driver changes? :) Sure, thanks for pointing this out. I may have fallen into that myself. > Pekon, can please post the .dts changes entirely separately from > the driver changes in the future? > >> Also, I don't think all of this code is ready. There are several >> comments from weeks ago that Pekon hasn't addressed. It's possible the >> DT binding changes can go in, but not some of the later patches, yet. > > Yes that's up to you. I have not looked at the MTD parts and I > appreciate the fact that you are reviewing that stuff. I've acked > the arch/arm/*omap* parts so hopefully I'm out of the loop now. Yes, I think so. The MTD stuff is the only remaining weak point I see. Brian