From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anand Moon Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] ARM: dts: exynos: update the usbdrd_phy suspend clk Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 10:36:12 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20181120185536.1159-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: devicetree , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel , Marek Szyprowski List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Krzysztof, On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 13:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 19:55, Anand Moon wrote: > > > > As per FSYS usbdrd_phy clk setting CLK_SCLK_USBD300/1 binds > > to SUSPEND_CLK so correct update the suspend clk. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anand Moon > > --- > > [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/6/12 > > changes from previous patch > > fix the order of clk and update the commit message > > > > FSYS block show in user manual > > > > CLKMUX_USBDRD300/1----CLKDIV_USBDRD300/1----SCLK_USBDRD300/1-----SUSPEND_CLK > > | > > |--CLKDIV_USBPHY300/1----SCLK_USBPHY300/1-----USBDRD30_PHY_0/1 > > Your new clock - SCLK_USBD301 - is not mentioned here. I don't get the > reason behind this change. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > My patch was based on following block diagram. [0] https://imgur.com/a/fmpk9aR But looks like I am bit wrong with this patch again. Sorry for the noise. Best Regards -Anand