From: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
To: Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@mediatek.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
Devicetree List <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] mmc: mediatek: Add subsys clock control for MT8192 msdc
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:58:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANMq1KDSw6gTL=5oicK5h_Q5rLhYUcANXw1M7RT=xRyT2PzUrA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201011091030.28547-5-wenbin.mei@mediatek.com>
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 5:10 PM Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@mediatek.com> wrote:
>
> MT8192 msdc is an independent sub system, we need control more bus
> clocks for it.
> Add support for the additional subsys clocks to allow it to be
> configured appropriately.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenbin Mei <wenbin.mei@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>
Err, you must not add R-by tag unless I explicitly say so (yes, I
reviewed v3, but I didn't add my R-by tag).
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> index a704745e5882..350e45432e21 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ struct msdc_host {
> struct clk *h_clk; /* msdc h_clk */
> struct clk *bus_clk; /* bus clock which used to access register */
> struct clk *src_clk_cg; /* msdc source clock control gate */
> + struct clk *sys_clk_cg; /* msdc subsys clock control gate */
> + struct clk_bulk_data bulk_clks[3]; /* pclk, axi, ahb clock control gate */
> u32 mclk; /* mmc subsystem clock frequency */
> u32 src_clk_freq; /* source clock frequency */
> unsigned char timing;
> @@ -784,6 +786,8 @@ static void msdc_set_busy_timeout(struct msdc_host *host, u64 ns, u64 clks)
>
> static void msdc_gate_clock(struct msdc_host *host)
> {
> + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(host->bulk_clks),
> + host->bulk_clks);
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->src_clk_cg);
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->src_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(host->bus_clk);
> @@ -792,10 +796,19 @@ static void msdc_gate_clock(struct msdc_host *host)
>
> static void msdc_ungate_clock(struct msdc_host *host)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> clk_prepare_enable(host->h_clk);
> clk_prepare_enable(host->bus_clk);
> clk_prepare_enable(host->src_clk);
> clk_prepare_enable(host->src_clk_cg);
> + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(host->bulk_clks),
> + host->bulk_clks);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(host->dev, "enable clks failed!\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> while (!(readl(host->base + MSDC_CFG) & MSDC_CFG_CKSTB))
> cpu_relax();
> }
> @@ -2366,6 +2379,53 @@ static void msdc_of_property_parse(struct platform_device *pdev,
> host->cqhci = false;
> }
>
> +static int msdc_of_clock_parse(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct msdc_host *host)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> +
> + host->src_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "source");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->src_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(host->src_clk);
> +
> + host->h_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->h_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(host->h_clk);
> +
> + host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "bus_clk");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->bus_clk))
> + host->bus_clk = NULL;
> +
> + /*source clock control gate is optional clock*/
> + host->src_clk_cg = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "source_cg");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->src_clk_cg))
> + host->src_clk_cg = NULL;
> +
> + host->sys_clk_cg = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "sys_cg");
> + if (IS_ERR(host->sys_clk_cg))
> + host->sys_clk_cg = NULL;
> +
> + /* If present, always enable for this clock gate */
> + clk_prepare_enable(host->sys_clk_cg);
Understand your reply on v3 (this clock gate cannot be disabled --
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11808433/#23678227), but I'm still
unsure if this is the right thing to do to enable it at probe time.
I'll let others comment.
> +
> + clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "pclk_cg");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + clk = NULL;
> + host->bulk_clks[0].clk = clk;
> +
> + clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "axi_cg");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + clk = NULL;
> + host->bulk_clks[1].clk = clk;
> +
> + clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "ahb_cg");
> + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> + clk = NULL;
> + host->bulk_clks[2].clk = clk;
Put the clock names in host->bulk_clks[x].id, then call
devm_clk_bulk_get_optional.
Example here: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c#L675
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> @@ -2405,25 +2465,9 @@ static int msdc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto host_free;
>
> - host->src_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "source");
> - if (IS_ERR(host->src_clk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(host->src_clk);
> - goto host_free;
> - }
> -
> - host->h_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "hclk");
> - if (IS_ERR(host->h_clk)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(host->h_clk);
> + ret = msdc_of_clock_parse(pdev, host);
> + if (ret)
> goto host_free;
> - }
> -
> - host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus_clk");
> - if (IS_ERR(host->bus_clk))
> - host->bus_clk = NULL;
> - /*source clock control gate is optional clock*/
> - host->src_clk_cg = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "source_cg");
> - if (IS_ERR(host->src_clk_cg))
> - host->src_clk_cg = NULL;
>
> host->reset = devm_reset_control_get_optional_exclusive(&pdev->dev,
> "hrst");
> --
> 2.18.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-11 9:10 [PATCH v4 0/4] Add mmc support for MT8192 SoC Wenbin Mei
2020-10-11 9:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: mmc: Convert mtk-sd to json-schema Wenbin Mei
2020-10-11 9:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mmc: dt-bindings: add support for MT8192 SoC Wenbin Mei
2020-10-11 9:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] arm64: dts: mt8192: add mmc device node Wenbin Mei
2020-10-11 9:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] mmc: mediatek: Add subsys clock control for MT8192 msdc Wenbin Mei
2020-10-12 0:58 ` Nicolas Boichat [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANMq1KDSw6gTL=5oicK5h_Q5rLhYUcANXw1M7RT=xRyT2PzUrA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wenbin.mei@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).