From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] ARM: dts: enable power subsystem for i.MX28 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:32:02 -0200 Message-ID: References: <1416514477-19190-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <1416514477-19190-4-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1416514477-19190-4-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Wahren Cc: Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Sebastian Reichel , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , David Woodhouse , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Stefan, On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > This patch enables the power subsystem for all i.MX28 boards. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi | 6 +++++- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > index 47f68ac..5c163a5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28.dtsi > @@ -1022,8 +1022,12 @@ > }; > > power: power@80044000 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx28-power"; Should we have 'fsl,imx23-power' and 'fsl,imx28-power' as compatible strings? Or ''fsl,mxs-power' could be used for both?