* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
@ 2018-07-20 10:23 Sébastien Szymanski
2018-07-23 1:40 ` Fabio Estevam
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sébastien Szymanski @ 2018-07-20 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree
Cc: Mark Rutland, Sascha Hauer, Rob Herring, NXP Linux Team,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Shawn Guo
Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
less complicated. For example:
imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
...
pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
fsl,pins = <
MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
>;
};
imx6ul-board.dts:
#include <imx6ul.dtsi>
#include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
...
imx6ull-board.dts:
#include <imx6ull.dtsi>
#include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
...
Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
misconfigured.
Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
index fdc46bb09cc1..7d7f05f7ea77 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
@@ -14,14 +14,25 @@
* The pin function ID is a tuple of
* <mux_reg conf_reg input_reg mux_mode input_val>
*/
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
-#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
+/* signals common for i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL */
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
+#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS
+#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
+#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS
+#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
+
+/* signals for i.MX6ULL only */
#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA0__EPDC_SDDO08 0x00E4 0x0370 0x0000 0x9 0x0
#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA1__EPDC_SDDO09 0x00E8 0x0374 0x0000 0x9 0x0
#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_EN__EPDC_SDDO10 0x00EC 0x0378 0x0000 0x9 0x0
--
2.16.4
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
2018-07-20 10:23 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL Sébastien Szymanski
@ 2018-07-23 1:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-08-07 17:59 ` Rob Herring
2018-08-21 8:53 ` Shawn Guo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2018-07-23 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sébastien Szymanski
Cc: Mark Rutland,
open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS,
Sascha Hauer, Rob Herring, NXP Linux Team,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Shawn Guo,
moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Sébastien Szymanski
<sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com> wrote:
> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
> less complicated. For example:
>
> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
> ...
> pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
> >;
> };
>
> imx6ul-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> imx6ull-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
> misconfigured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
2018-07-20 10:23 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL Sébastien Szymanski
2018-07-23 1:40 ` Fabio Estevam
@ 2018-08-07 17:59 ` Rob Herring
2018-08-21 8:53 ` Shawn Guo
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2018-08-07 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sébastien Szymanski
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Sascha Hauer, NXP Linux Team,
Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam, Shawn Guo,
linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
> less complicated. For example:
>
> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
> ...
> pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
> >;
> };
>
> imx6ul-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> imx6ull-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
> misconfigured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This may be less error prone, but it is ugly still.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
2018-07-20 10:23 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL Sébastien Szymanski
2018-07-23 1:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-08-07 17:59 ` Rob Herring
@ 2018-08-21 8:53 ` Shawn Guo
2018-08-22 11:41 ` Sébastien Szymanski
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2018-08-21 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sébastien Szymanski
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Sascha Hauer, Rob Herring,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
> less complicated. For example:
>
> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
> ...
> pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
> fsl,pins = <
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
> >;
> };
>
> imx6ul-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> imx6ull-board.dts:
> #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
> ...
>
> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
> misconfigured.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
> index fdc46bb09cc1..7d7f05f7ea77 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
> @@ -14,14 +14,25 @@
> * The pin function ID is a tuple of
> * <mux_reg conf_reg input_reg mux_mode input_val>
> */
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
> +/* signals common for i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL */
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
I do not see these 4 pinfunc in imx6ul-pinfunc.h. Are they really
available for i.MX6UL?
Shawn
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS
> +#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
> +
> +/* signals for i.MX6ULL only */
> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA0__EPDC_SDDO08 0x00E4 0x0370 0x0000 0x9 0x0
> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA1__EPDC_SDDO09 0x00E8 0x0374 0x0000 0x9 0x0
> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_EN__EPDC_SDDO10 0x00EC 0x0378 0x0000 0x9 0x0
> --
> 2.16.4
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL
2018-08-21 8:53 ` Shawn Guo
@ 2018-08-22 11:41 ` Sébastien Szymanski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sébastien Szymanski @ 2018-08-22 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shawn Guo
Cc: Mark Rutland, devicetree, Sascha Hauer, Rob Herring,
NXP Linux Team, Pengutronix Kernel Team, Fabio Estevam,
linux-arm-kernel
On 08/21/2018 10:53 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:23:21PM +0200, Sébastien Szymanski wrote:
>> Signals available on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL should have the same name
>> because it is the case of all others common signals, it avoids to make
>> mistakes (use the wrong ones) and it makes writing device tree files
>> less complicated. For example:
>>
>> imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi:
>> ...
>> pinctrl_uart5: uart5grp {
>> fsl,pins = <
>> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DCE_TX 0x1b0b1
>> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x1b0b1
>> >;
>> };
>>
>> imx6ul-board.dts:
>> #include <imx6ul.dtsi>
>> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
>> ...
>>
>> imx6ull-board.dts:
>> #include <imx6ull.dtsi>
>> #include <imx6ul-imx6ull-board.dtsi>
>> ...
>>
>> Without this patch, the imx6ull-board.dtb will use
>> MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX instead of
>> MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX and the uart5 will be
>> misconfigured.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sébastien Szymanski <sebastien.szymanski@armadeus.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
>> index fdc46bb09cc1..7d7f05f7ea77 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ull-pinfunc.h
>> @@ -14,14 +14,25 @@
>> * The pin function ID is a tuple of
>> * <mux_reg conf_reg input_reg mux_mode input_val>
>> */
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
>> -#define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
>> +/* signals common for i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL */
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x0084 0x0310 0x0644 0x9 0x4
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x0088 0x0314 0x0644 0x9 0x5
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_CTS_B__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x008C 0x0318 0x0640 0x9 0x3
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART1_RTS_B__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x0090 0x031C 0x0640 0x9 0x4
>
> I do not see these 4 pinfunc in imx6ul-pinfunc.h. Are they really
> available for i.MX6UL?
They are not. I've just sent a v2.
Thanks.
Regards,
>
> Shawn
>
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_TX_DATA__UART5_DTE_RX 0x00BC 0x0348 0x0644 0x0 0x6
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_UART5_RX_DATA__UART5_DCE_RX 0x00C0 0x034C 0x0644 0x0 0x7
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_RX_EN__UART5_DCE_RTS 0x00CC 0x0358 0x0640 0x1 0x5
>> +#undef MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS
>> +#define MX6UL_PAD_ENET1_TX_DATA0__UART5_DTE_RTS 0x00D0 0x035C 0x0640 0x1 0x6
>> +
>> +/* signals for i.MX6ULL only */
>> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA0__EPDC_SDDO08 0x00E4 0x0370 0x0000 0x9 0x0
>> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_DATA1__EPDC_SDDO09 0x00E8 0x0374 0x0000 0x9 0x0
>> #define MX6ULL_PAD_ENET2_RX_EN__EPDC_SDDO10 0x00EC 0x0378 0x0000 0x9 0x0
>> --
>> 2.16.4
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
Sébastien Szymanski
Software engineer, Armadeus Systems
Tel: +33 (0)9 72 29 41 44
Fax: +33 (0)9 72 28 79 26
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-22 11:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-20 10:23 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: dts: imx6ull: keep IMX6UL_ prefix for signals on both i.MX6UL and i.MX6ULL Sébastien Szymanski
2018-07-23 1:40 ` Fabio Estevam
2018-08-07 17:59 ` Rob Herring
2018-08-21 8:53 ` Shawn Guo
2018-08-22 11:41 ` Sébastien Szymanski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).